Specific methodology for assessing SOTIF residual risk (detailed in Table 11)

Описание: This video provides a detailed exploration of SOTIF (Safety of the Intended Functionality) based on the ISO 21448 standard. Learn how autonomous systems address "invisible threats"—hazardous situations that occur even without hardware or software failures. We dive into the methodology for assessing residual risk, categorizing driving scenarios, and the continuous safety cycle required for modern automotive electronics.

Key Topics Covered:
Functional Safety (ISO 26262) vs. SOTIF (ISO 21448)
The Four Areas of Scenario Mapping (Known/Unknown & Safe/Unsafe)
The SOTIF Safety Toolkit: 17 Methods for Risk Hunting
Corner Cases vs. Edge Cases in Autonomous Testing
The Limits of Simulation and the Importance of Real-World Evidence
The Continuous Safety Journey and Software Updates

Timestamps:
00:00:00 The Invisible Threat: Can a Perfect Car Be Dangerous?
00:00:39 Functional Safety vs. SOTIF
00:01:01 Introduction to SOTIF (ISO 21448)
00:01:20 Mapping the Unknown: Categorizing Scenarios
00:01:58 The Four Areas: Known-Safe to Unknown-Unsafe
00:02:33 The Mission: Shrinking Area 3 (The Danger Zone)
00:02:51 The Safety Toolkit: Hunting for Hidden Risks
00:03:12 Real-World Evidence: Fleet Tests and Field Experience
00:03:44 Corner Cases vs. Edge Cases
00:04:15 Virtual Stress Testing: Noise Injection and Ghost Signals
00:04:46 The Human Factor: User Testing and Foreseeable Misuse
00:05:22 The Limits of Simulation: Why Real Miles Matter
00:06:20 A Balanced Approach: From Simulation to Public Roads
00:06:44 Safety Is a Journey: The Work Is Never Done
00:07:19 The Continuous Safety Cycle and Software Updates
00:08:06 Conclusion: Deciding What Is "Safe Enough"

#SOTIF #ISO21448 #AutonomousDriving #FunctionalSafety #ISO26262 #AutomotiveEngineering #SystemsEngineering #ResidualRisk #ADASSafety #AutoSysEng #SelfDrivingCars #AutomotiveTech #SafetyCritical #MBSE #EngineeringLife