How Safe is Safe Enough? (Acceptance Criteria)

Описание: In this video, we explore one of the most critical questions in autonomous vehicle engineering: "How do we prove a self-driving car is safe enough?"

This video covers the core concepts of SOTIF (Safety of the Intended Functionality) Clause 4, focusing on Acceptance Criteria. We move beyond the myth of perfection to discuss residual risk and the mathematical/philosophical frameworks used to define safety targets.

Key Topics Covered:
The concept of Residual Risk and the limits of physics.
The 4 Pillars of Safety Philosophy: GAMB, PRB, ALARP, and MEM.
Practical implementation: From UN R157 to Mobileye’s RSS.
Building a formal Safety Case.

Timestamps:
[00:00] Introduction: The Myth of the Perfect Car
[01:13] Physics & Kinetic Energy: Why Zero Risk is Impossible
[01:37] Understanding Residual Risk in an Open World
[02:04] Defining Acceptance Criteria: Drawing the Line in the Sand
[03:18] The 4 Pillars of Safety Philosophy (Overview)
[03:45] GAMB, PRB, ALARP, and MEM Explained
[04:51] Translating Philosophy into Engineering: UN R157 & Braking Force
[05:43] Mathematical Models: RSS and the "Careful Driver" Profile
[06:43] Building the Safety Case: Hazards, Evaluation, and Criteria
[07:25] Conclusion: Safety as a Continuous Journey

#AutonomousDriving #FunctionalSafety #SafetyEngineering #SOTIF Clause4 #ResidualRisk #ALARP #SafetyCase #ADAS