The One Question Every Globalism Debate Avoids
Автор: Climate Mundial's Energy and Climate Weekly
Загружено: 2026-02-12
Просмотров: 44
Описание:
In my last video, I tried to define what people mean when they say “globalism.” What surprised me was what happened next: the comment section became a kind of open-source debate — definitions, historical examples, trade and monetary angles, and the deeper issue of political scale.
So this sequel asks a more precise question: when does cooperation stop being legitimate — and start being experienced as globalism?
My core proposition is simple: political unity becomes “globalist” when authority expands faster than democratic consent, institutional capacity, and shared identity.
To test that, we look at four different pathways to legitimacy — Germany (trade before sovereignty), Italy (identity before institutions), the United States (security, money, consent), and Australia (federation by consent).
What do you think? Do you agree that globalism is essentially authority outrunning legitimacy — or is it something else?
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке: