History of Soomro | Soomro ki Tarekh
Автор: HISTORY with Karamat
Загружено: 2025-04-19
Просмотров: 5869
Описание:
History of Soomro | Soomro ki Tarekh #soomro
Soomro caste ki Tarekh
Soomro in history
Soomro ki Tarekh
Soomro Sindhi
Soomro dynasty
Soomro Kon Hain
Who are Soomro
Soomro ki history
#soomro #soomrodynesty
#soomrosindhi #soomrocaste #historyofsoomro #history #dodosoomro
#bhongar #muhammadbinqasim #arrore #historyofsindh #sindhicaste
This video documentary is made for your information and knowledge. I try my best to uncover the all real facts, and I collect this information from the various resources, I-e local books, English books, magazines, newspapers, and I visits so many sites, google, AI, YouTube, Wikipedia etc including local libraries. I try my best to appear all things which relates this topic, but it is possible, I left something. So it is my request if you know further this topic please inform us in comment box. Thanks for your time and visit.
Lashari
• Complete History of Lashari || Laashari an...
Samejo
• Samejo in History | Sameja caste ki Tarekh...
Bakhar Fort
• Bakhar Fort & Sukkur city #bakharfort
Tanoli
• History of Tanoli Pathan | King of Amb sta...
Kolachi
• History of Kolachi | Kolachi in history #k...
Pathan
• History of Pashton and Pathan || #pashton
The Soomro dynasty ruled parts of Sindh after the fall of the Arab rule.
People of the Soomro caste are proud of their historical contributions and heritage.
Soomro ki Tarekh mein Sindh ke bahadur aur azad pasand logon ka zikar milta hai.
Dodo Soomro is remembered in Sindhi folklore as a symbol of bravery and resistance.
Chanesar Soomro was a famous ruler known for his wisdom and leadership.
Muhammad Bin Qasim conquered Sindh in 712 AD, laying the foundation of Muslim rule in the region.
Raja Dahir was the last Hindu ruler of Sindh, defeated by Muhammad Bin Qasim.
The early history of Soomras is unclear. Ali describes the flight and eventual death by drowning of Hafif (var. Khafif), then-ruler of Sindh, during the faceoff with Mahmud but does not specify whether he was the last Habbarid or first Soomra. Later chroniclers like Ali ibn al-Athir (c. late 12th c.) and Ibn Khaldun (c. late 14th c.) attributed the fall of Habbarids to Mahmud of Ghazni, lending credence to the argument of Hafif being the last Habbarid. The Soomras appear to have established themselves as a regional power in this vacuum.
They have been retrospectively claimed to be Parmar Rajputs. In Ain I Akbari (16th century) the Sumra dynesty is mentioned as of A Rajput leneage. Some of them were adherents of Isma'ilism — Arab travelers held them to be Qarmatians, and correspondence with the Fatimid caliph, Al-Mustansir Billah has been located.
Territory
The Ghurids and Ghaznavids continued to rule parts of Sindh, across the eleventh and early twelfth century, alongside Soomras. The precise delineations have yet to be discovered, but the Soomras were probably centered in lower Sindh. One of their kings Shimuddin Chamisar had submitted to Iltutmish, the Sultan of Delhi, and was allowed to continue as a vassal.
The Soomro tribe established the Soomra dynasty in 1025 CE, which re-established native Sindhi rule over Sindh following the Arab conquests. Many members of the Soomro tribe were among the first in Sindh to convert to Islam from Hinduism but initially continued to maintain several Hindu customs and traditions.
The Sūmras are believed to be Sodha Rajputs who embraced Islam through Ismāʿilī influence. After conversion, they adopted the name Sūmra.
Maulai Shedai, a local researcher, believes Soomra are Parmar Rajputs. But Ahmad Hasan Dani claims "of this there is no definite proof" and adds that it is almost certain the tribe has local origins as the kings bore local names. M. H. Panhwar, a Sindhologist, also rejects a Rajput origin and attributes its to James Todd but still accepts native origin. Some writers have detailed about a subdivision in Jats with the name "Sumra". But Historian André Wink has mentioned that the Soomras were not Jats.
He has also explained that Soomras who were of local Sindhi origin and had been semi-independent rulers after the death of Mahmud of Ghazni were different to pastoral-nomadic Jats or Meds. As per him, rise of Soomras was one of the factor in movement of the Jats of lower Sindh towards north. Ghulam Hussain and others argue that the Soomros and other native tribes indigenous to Sindh slowly began to 'Ashrafize' themselves by remaking their genealogies to further associate themselves with Syeds whom they possibly intermarried and acquired power through.
According to Tarikh Waqa`i Rajisthan, Soomras were Parmar Rajputs.
Pre-eminent Sindhi scholar Nabi Baksh Baloch tried to reconcile all different conflicting accounts of Soomra origin. He considered Soomras, a hybrid race that was mix of Sindhi-Arab blood, emerged after the Umayyad caliph Sulayman ibn Abd al-Malik’s decree asking Arab officers posted in Sindh to settle in the land permanently. Consequently they took Sindhi wives and subsequently married their daughters in Sindhi families. Hence, Dr. Baloch writes that:
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке: