ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorks Police (1992) | A-Level Law | Key Case Summaries | Tort Law

Автор: tutor2u

Загружено: 2022-09-04

Просмотров: 2687

Описание: In this case the courts laid down the tests that would be used to determine when a secondary victim may be compensated for psychiatric damage in negligence cases, they must have close ties of love and affection with the primary victims, witness the shocking scene or its immediate aftermath, and do so with their own unaided sense.

#tortlaw #tort #alevellaw

VIDEO CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction

CASE SUMMARY

Claimant: Families of victims of the Hillsborough disaster, some present at the scene in a different area, some witnessing them on TV

Defendant: Police

Facts:
During an FA Cup semi-final in 1989 between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest, Police ordered that an exit gate be opened in order to reduce the crowds forming outside of the ground. This led to a fatal human crush causing 96 deaths and nearly 800 injuries. Families of the victims brought a claim for psychiatric damage after learning that their family members were involved in the incident.

Outcome: Not Liable

Legal principle:
The courts laid down the tests that would be used to determine when a secondary victim may be compensated for psychiatric damage in negligence cases. None of the parties in this case were successful.

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorks Police (1992) | A-Level Law | Key Case Summaries | Tort Law

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital (1969) | A-Level Law | Key Case Summaries | Tort Law

Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital (1969) | A-Level Law | Key Case Summaries | Tort Law

Case Summary- Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992]- Control Mechanisms-Tort law

Case Summary- Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992]- Control Mechanisms-Tort law

Майкл и другие против начальника полиции Южного Уэльса и др.

Майкл и другие против начальника полиции Южного Уэльса и др.

4 Hours Chopin for Studying, Concentration & Relaxation

4 Hours Chopin for Studying, Concentration & Relaxation

Peter Mandelson arrested by Met Police

Peter Mandelson arrested by Met Police

Рабочая музыка для глубокой концентрации и сверхэффективности

Рабочая музыка для глубокой концентрации и сверхэффективности

Удар США по Кремлю / Резкая реакция Москвы

Удар США по Кремлю / Резкая реакция Москвы

What was the HOUSE OF LORDS' DECISION in White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999]?Tort law.

What was the HOUSE OF LORDS' DECISION in White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999]?Tort law.

Иерархия управления

Иерархия управления

OCR A Level Law ⚖️ | Actus Reus & Mens Rea Explained | Criminal Liability | Paper 1, section B 📝

OCR A Level Law ⚖️ | Actus Reus & Mens Rea Explained | Criminal Liability | Paper 1, section B 📝

Highlight: Just Call Me Mystic Ian - how Private Eye predicted Andrew's arrest

Highlight: Just Call Me Mystic Ian - how Private Eye predicted Andrew's arrest

Government set to remove Andrew from the line of succession | LBC

Government set to remove Andrew from the line of succession | LBC

Rymanowski, Miller: Mentalny konfederata?

Rymanowski, Miller: Mentalny konfederata?

Robinson v West Yorks Police (2018) | A-Level Law | Key Case Summaries | Tort Law

Robinson v West Yorks Police (2018) | A-Level Law | Key Case Summaries | Tort Law

What is the law on rescuers in tort? Can rescuers get damages for pure psychiatric harm?

What is the law on rescuers in tort? Can rescuers get damages for pure psychiatric harm?

Secondary Victims | Law of Tort

Secondary Victims | Law of Tort

Bolton v Stone (Duty of care)

Bolton v Stone (Duty of care)

Distinguishing Balfour v Balfour and Merritt v Merritt

Distinguishing Balfour v Balfour and Merritt v Merritt

Неттлшип против Уэстона (1971) | Юридическая практика уровня A | Краткое изложение основных дел |...

Неттлшип против Уэстона (1971) | Юридическая практика уровня A | Краткое изложение основных дел |...

BLACKPINK - ‘GO’ M/V

BLACKPINK - ‘GO’ M/V

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]