ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

The Hitman Luis Rivera: Full Missing Interrogation Footage (Audio/Video Fixed) - Dan Markel Murder

Автор: TCT

Загружено: 2024-02-19

Просмотров: 175600

Описание: 20th February 2024 Tallahassee Florida: Luis Rivera Missing Footage about the Black Nissans From Interrogation (audio and video fixed).

Please like each video and subscribe to the channel.

Buy Ruth Markels Book "The Unveiling" here:
https://amzn.to/3UbvfLk

Wondery Podcast :    • Episode 6: Who Killed Law Professor Daniel...  

Neumann Microphone - BCM 705 - https://amzn.to/3SANloY

IMO - In My Opinion, This is a reaction channel, not a news channel. I have no affiliation to anyone involved in this case, its a reaction to their own words. Its all just speculation and opinion.

Tip Me Here:
https://www.paypal.com/
Become a Patron by paying direct to Caley's Paypal Acount - [email protected]

Join this channel as a Supportive Membership Plan FIBBER for 0.99c USD to get access to perks:
   / @tcttvradio  

New Zealand Defamation Act 1992
Public Act

1992 No 105
Date of assent

26 November 1992

Honest opinion:
In proceedings for defamation, the defence known before the commencement of this Act as the defence of fair comment shall, after the commencement of this Act, be known as the defence of honest opinion.
10Opinion must be genuine
(1)
In any proceedings for defamation in respect of matter that includes or consists of an expression of opinion, a defence of honest opinion by a defendant who is the author of the matter containing the opinion shall fail unless the defendant proves that the opinion expressed was the defendant’s genuine opinion.
(2)
In any proceedings for defamation in respect of matter that includes or consists of an expression of opinion, a defence of honest opinion by a defendant who is not the author of the matter containing the opinion shall fail unless,—
(a)
where the author of the matter containing the opinion was, at the time of the publication of that matter, an employee or agent of the defendant, the defendant proves that—
(i)
the opinion, in its context and in the circumstances of the publication of the matter that is the subject of the proceedings, did not purport to be the opinion of the defendant; and
(ii)
the defendant believed that the opinion was the genuine opinion of the author of the matter containing the opinion:
(b)
where the author of the matter containing the opinion was not an employee or agent of the defendant at the time of the publication of that matter, the defendant proves that—
(i)
the opinion, in its context and in the circumstances of the publication of the matter that is the subject of the proceedings, did not purport to be the opinion of the defendant or of any employee or agent of the defendant; and
(ii)
the defendant had no reasonable cause to believe that the opinion was not the genuine opinion of the author of the matter containing the opinion.
(3)
A defence of honest opinion shall not fail because the defendant was motivated by malice.
11Defendant not required to prove truth of every statement of fact
In proceedings for defamation in respect of matter that consists partly of statements of fact and partly of statements of opinion, a defence of honest opinion shall not fail merely because the defendant does not prove the truth of every statement of fact if the opinion is shown to be genuine opinion having regard to—
(a)
those facts (being facts that are alleged or referred to in the publication containing the matter that is the subject of the proceedings) that are proved to be true, or not materially different from the truth; or
(b)
any other facts that were generally known at the time of the publication and are proved to be true.
Compare: 1954 No 46 s 8

12: Honest opinion where corrupt motive attributed to plaintiff
In any proceedings for defamation in which the defendant relies on a defence of honest opinion, the fact that the matter that is the subject of the proceedings attributes a dishonourable, corrupt, or base motive to the plaintiff does not require the defendant to prove anything that the defendant would not be required to prove if the matter did not attribute any such motive.

#justicefordanmarkel #wendiadelson #donnaadelson

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
The Hitman Luis Rivera: Full Missing Interrogation Footage (Audio/Video Fixed) - Dan Markel Murder

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

Dan Markel’s Dad Reads Family Victim Impact Statement

Dan Markel’s Dad Reads Family Victim Impact Statement

Narcissist wife tries to outsmart cops

Narcissist wife tries to outsmart cops

Magbanua's attorney cross examines Luis Rivera

Magbanua's attorney cross examines Luis Rivera

Lacasse's Full List of Revelations - Final Interview of Sherlock-Holmes-Like Prof. Jeffrey Lacasse

Lacasse's Full List of Revelations - Final Interview of Sherlock-Holmes-Like Prof. Jeffrey Lacasse

Dan Markel case: Garcia's attorney cross examines Rivera

Dan Markel case: Garcia's attorney cross examines Rivera

State Hammers Charlie Adelson in Hitman Conspiracy Murder Trial Cross-Examination

State Hammers Charlie Adelson in Hitman Conspiracy Murder Trial Cross-Examination

Luis Rivera takes the witness stand in Dan Markel case (Part 1)

Luis Rivera takes the witness stand in Dan Markel case (Part 1)

Suspect Solves Murder - Unredacted* 1st Interrogation of Sherlock-Holmes-Like Prof. Jeffrey Lacasse

Suspect Solves Murder - Unredacted* 1st Interrogation of Sherlock-Holmes-Like Prof. Jeffrey Lacasse

New Details About Wendi Adelson Three Hours After Murder from Former Lead Detective Isom

New Details About Wendi Adelson Three Hours After Murder from Former Lead Detective Isom

Juror #6: The Testimony and Pivotal Moment That Sealed Donna Adelson’s Fate with Guilty Verdict

Juror #6: The Testimony and Pivotal Moment That Sealed Donna Adelson’s Fate with Guilty Verdict

New Look At Charlie Adelson's Trial - Luis Rivera Uncensored

New Look At Charlie Adelson's Trial - Luis Rivera Uncensored

Адвокат защиты допрашивает свидетеля Луиса Риверу о том, что ему известно об убийстве Дэна Маркела

Адвокат защиты допрашивает свидетеля Луиса Риверу о том, что ему известно об убийстве Дэна Маркела

Charlie Adelson vs Georgia Cappleman: no competition, plenty of cognitive dissonance.

Charlie Adelson vs Georgia Cappleman: no competition, plenty of cognitive dissonance.

Wendi Adelson: indicators of involvement (unindicted co-conspirator in murder of Dan Markel)

Wendi Adelson: indicators of involvement (unindicted co-conspirator in murder of Dan Markel)

Hired Hitman Testifies Against Charlie Adelson in FSU Law Professor Murder Trial

Hired Hitman Testifies Against Charlie Adelson in FSU Law Professor Murder Trial

The

The "UNREDACTED" Interview of Jeffrey Lacasse

Donna Adelson trial: Katherine Magbanua testifies as 'middle-man' between Charlie Adelson and hitman

Donna Adelson trial: Katherine Magbanua testifies as 'middle-man' between Charlie Adelson and hitman

FSU Law Professor Murder Trial - Sigfredo Garcia Verdict

FSU Law Professor Murder Trial - Sigfredo Garcia Verdict

Why is Jack Campbell failing to pursue more Adelsons - despite ample evidence

Why is Jack Campbell failing to pursue more Adelsons - despite ample evidence

Звездный свидетель по делу Донны Адельсон, Луис Ривера, убийца Дэна Маркела, даёт показания

Звездный свидетель по делу Донны Адельсон, Луис Ривера, убийца Дэна Маркела, даёт показания

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]