ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

Lawrence v. Texas: LGBT rights in the U.S. | Constitutional Law

LGBT rights

LGBT rights in America

Lawrence v. Texas

Lawerence v. Texas

sloth law

same-sex marriage

gay marriage

anti-sodomy laws

supreme court case

constitutional law explained

law school case

constitutional law

Автор: Sloth Law

Загружено: 2020-08-08

Просмотров: 2440

Описание: Today, we're talking about LGBT rights and privacy in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), the anti-sodomy case that brought about the decriminalization of same-sex intimate conduct in the United States. This is the case that explicitly overturned the Bowers decision from 1986.

When you talk law and LGBT rights in the United States, this is considered a tipping point as the court looked at the privacy right of citizens, including LGBT people and how that interacts with the constitution. Here, the court found that LGBT individuals had access to the same sort of privacy protection for intimte sexual conduct as straight people.

Disclaimer: Please be aware, no information provided in this video, or any other on this channel, should ever be taken as legal advice or recommendation. The information is provided for entertainment purposes only. Should you have legal questions or needs, please seek out a local attorney.

Any elements held within this video which are the subject of copyright, whether image, sound, voice, moving picture, or otherwise is used under Fair Use for purposes of education.

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Lawrence v. Texas: LGBT rights in the U.S. | Constitutional Law

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

Federalism: Barron v. Mayor of Baltimore | Constitutional Law

Federalism: Barron v. Mayor of Baltimore | Constitutional Law

Washington v. Davis: Discrimination in Intent or Effect? | Constitutional Law

Washington v. Davis: Discrimination in Intent or Effect? | Constitutional Law

Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina | Final | Australian Open 2026 Extended Highlights 🇦🇺

Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina | Final | Australian Open 2026 Extended Highlights 🇦🇺

JUST IN: Tammy Duckworth Clashes With Marco Rubio Over Use Of 'Notorious Wartime Law'

JUST IN: Tammy Duckworth Clashes With Marco Rubio Over Use Of 'Notorious Wartime Law'

CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT with Titus Oates  | Constitutional Law

CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT with Titus Oates | Constitutional Law

Aryna Sabalenka v Elena Rybakina Highlights | Australian Open 2026 Final

Aryna Sabalenka v Elena Rybakina Highlights | Australian Open 2026 Final

"Zielone szaleństwo”. Rachunki kontra codzienność

Ziemkiewicz o Hołowni: zrobili z niego psychopatę, bo podskoczył Tuskowi!

Ziemkiewicz o Hołowni: zrobili z niego psychopatę, bo podskoczył Tuskowi!

Пожалуйста, выйдите из машины, сэр: Пенсильвания против Миммса | Уголовное право

Пожалуйста, выйдите из машины, сэр: Пенсильвания против Миммса | Уголовное право

IRAN. To dlatego Stany zaatakują. Inwazja inna niż wszystkie

IRAN. To dlatego Stany zaatakują. Inwazja inna niż wszystkie

Ожидание неприкосновенности частной жизни: дело Кац против Соединенных Штатов | Уголовное право

Ожидание неприкосновенности частной жизни: дело Кац против Соединенных Штатов | Уголовное право

Abrams v. U.S.:  Sedition, Intent, and First Amendment | Criminal Law

Abrams v. U.S.: Sedition, Intent, and First Amendment | Criminal Law

Tech, MJ, and the Fourth Amendment: Kyllo v. United States | Criminal Law

Tech, MJ, and the Fourth Amendment: Kyllo v. United States | Criminal Law

State v. Federal: Erie Railroad v. Tompkins | Civil Procedure

State v. Federal: Erie Railroad v. Tompkins | Civil Procedure

LIVE: Glenn Kirschner testifies for Congress, spars with Jim Jordan

LIVE: Glenn Kirschner testifies for Congress, spars with Jim Jordan

Birthright Citizenship Explained | SCOTUS Update!

Birthright Citizenship Explained | SCOTUS Update!

MAZUREK OBEJRZAŁ. INNI NIE CHCĄ. DOKUMENT O MELANII TRUMP W KINACH

MAZUREK OBEJRZAŁ. INNI NIE CHCĄ. DOKUMENT O MELANII TRUMP W KINACH

MAPP v. OHIO EXPLAINED: The Exclusionary Rule | Criminal Law

MAPP v. OHIO EXPLAINED: The Exclusionary Rule | Criminal Law

STOP AND FRISK: TERRY v. OHIO | Criminal Law

STOP AND FRISK: TERRY v. OHIO | Criminal Law

What does a jury summons mean?

What does a jury summons mean?

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]