Andrey Smaev DESTROYS Science Based Training | 26 Inch Arms & Extreme Volume Training

Описание: Most science-based lifters will say:
“High volume like this is junk volume.”
“It will cause overtraining.”
“It’s not optimal.”

And according to research averages, they are not wrong.

But bodybuilding is not built on averages it’s built on outliers.

SCIENCE vs Individual RESPONSE

Science tells us what works for the majority of people,
but bodybuilding success depends on individual response.

Andrey Smaev is a genetic outlier:

Extremely high work capacity

Insane recovery ability

High tolerance to volume and fatigue

Favorable muscle insertions & leverage

Likely higher muscle fiber endurance

That’s why he can do things science cannot fully explain or recommend.

Let me be clear

Science is NOT wrong Evidence based training is NOT useless

Science is descriptive, not predictive for individuals. What works for Andrey Smaev will destroy 99% of lifters.

Science based training should be
A starting point, not a fixed rule,
Adapted to genetics & recovery
Modified by real-world feedback

Same science. Different bodies. Different responses.

Bodybuilding is not about what’s optimal on paper it’s about what you can recover from and grow from.
Even though training is called “scientific”, individual response varies due to -

Genetics (muscle fiber type, leverages, insertions)

Recovery capacity (CNS, sleep, stress tolerance)

Volume & intensity tolerance

Injury history

Hormonal & metabolic differences

Training age (beginner vs advanced)

This is why one program doesn’t fit all, even if it’s evidence based