Scott Peterson Speaks: Pt5 SWORN Declaration in 2025 Habeas Could Change Everything — Even Your Mind

Описание: This video is Part 5 of something the public has never heard before: Scott Peterson’s own words in his 125-page declaration, submitted as part of his 2025 habeas petition. For the first time in over 20 years, Scott has laid out his side of the story in detail — not through lawyers, not in a TV interview, but in a sworn legal declaration under penalty of perjury.

Watch Part 1, 2, 3, and 4 first:
Part 1:    • Scott Peterson Speaks: SWORN Declaration i...  
Part 2:    • Scott Peterson Speaks: Pt2 SWORN Declarati...  
Part 3:    • Scott Peterson Speaks: Pt3 SWORN Declarati...  
Part 4:    • Scott Peterson Speaks: Pt4 SWORN Declarati...  

📖 In this fifth installment, I continue reading directly from his declaration and show you the actual exhibits, police photos, and timelines Scott references. We’re now moving into the sections titled “MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATION — December 24, 2002,” “December 25, 2002,” and “December 26, 2002,” where Scott describes what he says happened in the immediate aftermath of Laci being reported missing — and how quickly the investigation, media narrative, and prosecution theories began taking shape.

This isn’t a retelling of the old narrative — it’s Peterson describing, in his own words, what he says happened during those critical first 48 hours.

We’ll cover:

🔺 Scott’s account of his first contact with Modesto Police around 6:00 p.m., his immediate consent to searches, and what he says he told detectives about Laci’s plans for the day.
🔺 Scott’s description of police restricting his movement — including being blocked from going inside to retrieve photos of Laci for volunteers searching door-to-door.
🔺 Neighbor Karen Servas’s call about finding the Peterson dog wandering with his leash on.
🔺 The late-night trip to the warehouse and Scott’s argument that trial testimony about “no electricity” was false — and that the search warrant affidavit reflected what he actually said (limited lighting).
🔺 Scott’s statement that Brocchini destroyed his handwritten notes from that night — and how the habeas filing frames that within broader evidence-handling issues.
🔺 December 25: Scott’s explanation for moving the umbrellas, tarp, and boat cover due to rain — and why he says the prosecution’s “cover-up” narrative (fertilizer/gas masking) was unsupported.
🔺 The push for a polygraph, Scott’s account of his father advising him not to take it, and Scott’s claim that hours-long interviews on Dec. 25 were not recorded.
🔺 The wording of MPD’s public messaging (“claiming” she was missing), and Scott’s assertion that police cues helped drive the media narrative almost immediately.
🔺 December 26: organizing the volunteer center, the jogger tip Scott references (Mike Chiavetta), and Scott’s reaction to police publicly emphasizing his fishing alibi at the press conference.

⚖️ Background of the Case

In December 2002, Laci Peterson, 27 and eight months pregnant, disappeared from her Modesto, California home. Her husband Scott was later arrested, and in 2004 a jury convicted him of murdering both Laci and their unborn son, Conner. The conviction was built on only circumstantial evidence — including Scott’s affair, claims of "suspicious" behavior noted by police, and the discovery of Laci and Conner’s remains in the San Francisco Bay. Scott was sentenced to death in 2005, but the California Supreme Court overturned the death penalty in 2020 due to serious jury selection errors. His sentence was reduced to life without parole. Despite maintaining innocence, his appeals were denied for years — until the Los Angeles Innocence Project took on his case in 2023.

📂 The 2025 Habeas Petition was Filed in August 2025.

The petition alleges major constitutional violations, supported by thousands of pages of exhibits, including:

✔️ False science about Conner’s date of death.
✔️ False tidal/anchor evidence about where the bodies were found.
✔️ Bad scent dog evidence at the marina.
✔️ Burglary actually happened on Dec 24, not the 26th.
✔️ Ignored eyewitnesses who saw Laci alive with the dog.
✔️ Boat wasn’t secret — evidence shows Laci knew about it.
✔️ Destroyed evidence (burglar interviews, safe, watch, Aponte tapes).
✔️ Suppressed evidence the jury never heard.
✔️ False arguments made to the jury.
✔️ Cumulative errors undermine the conviction.

When all these problems are combined, LAIP argues the conviction cannot stand.

NOTE: I’m not a legal expert. I’m a true-crime content creator who researches public court records and provides opinion commentary for discussion and educational purposes. Please do your own research, look at the filings yourself, and always form your own opinions. Everything I’m sharing in this video comes directly from publicly available legal documents — including Scott Peterson’s declaration and exhibits filed as part of the 2025 habeas petition. These are public court filings, and I have every right to read from them, reference them, and analyze them here.