Logan Paul's PSA 10 Pikachu Illustrator is NOT the only Gem Mint 10

Описание: Logan Paul’s PSA 10 Pikachu Illustrator is currently breaking records with bids surpassing $5 million — but is it really the only Gem Mint 10… and is it truly deserving of the grade?

In this video, we break down the controversy surrounding the condition of Logan Paul’s PSA 10 Pikachu Illustrator, analyze high-resolution scans from PSA’s database, and compare it directly to a lesser-known TAG 10 Pikachu Illustrator that many collectors believe is in equal or better condition.

We’ll dive into:

Why many collectors dispute Logan Paul’s PSA 10 grade

Close-up analysis of corner wear, whitening, and edge damage

The history of the PSA 10 Illustrator (graded in 2014 under older standards)

A second Gem Mint Pikachu Illustrator originally graded CGC 10, later cracked and submitted to PSA

Why PSA ultimately graded that card a PSA 9

Allegations of grading politics and population control at PSA

Whether brand value outweighs actual card condition

Which Pikachu Illustrator is objectively in better shape

Using side-by-side comparisons, TAG’s digital grading report, and PSA’s own scans, we ask the uncomfortable question:

👉 If you remove the PSA label and Logan Paul’s name — which card is actually better?

This video isn’t about hate or hype — it’s about condition, consistency, and transparency in Pokémon card grading. Whether you collect PSA, CGC, TAG, or raw cards, this discussion highlights the flaws and realities of the grading industry at the very top of the hobby.

💬 Let me know your thoughts:

Should the TAG 10 have received a PSA 10?

Would PSA ever grade another Pikachu Illustrator a 10 today?

Does population control exist at the highest level?



Follow on Instagram -   / jaronhav_tcg  

Website Coming Soon!