The Science Behind Racial Discrimination Explained

Описание: #intelligence #iqtesting #psychology #history #jensen #education #eugenics
Who is Arthur Jensen? Are there race differences in IQ? Are there genetic differences between races? Should all jobs be available to all races? Should all races be educated the same? Should we pre-determine the social value of children to designate appropriate jobs as adults?

What happens when you:
cancel compensatory education programs
funnel "low IQ" students into non-academic 'training'
justify that most "low IQ" students are POC
....?

Well, you prevent POC from getting professional positions and challenging the class structure, of course.

Arthur Jensen takes a William Shockley-like approach by widening the scientific discussion of intelligence and races from the circle of science to the public commons. This attempt to change the Overton Window is now part of the playbook for contemporary Neo-Nazi and Far Right movements.

Argument stopper: Provide evidence for genetic differences in intelligence between races.

They can't, because it doesn't exist.

Within-group differences cannot be used to justify between-group differences.
===================
Here's an AI summary:
In March 1969, Arthur Jensen's article in the Harvard Educational Review ignited a significant debate over racial differences in intelligence, positioning genetic factors at the forefront of the discussion. Jensen's claims, which were supported by the controversial Pioneer Fund and aligned with segregationist ideologies, suggested that a disproportionate number of whites were genetically predisposed to higher IQs, thereby justifying educational inequalities. This assertion not only attracted attention from scientists across various fields—such as psychology, anthropology, and sociology—but also sparked public discourse on the complex interplay between genetics and race. Despite his insistence on a scientific basis for racial disparities, Jensen later admitted that there was no conclusive evidence to support his theories, raising questions about the validity of his arguments.

Jensen's work, often referred to as Jensenism, has been criticized for its weak scientific foundation and reliance on personal beliefs rather than empirical data. His notion that educational policies should be grounded in genetic realities led to a political agenda that many viewed as unfavorable to the aspirations of Black individuals. The controversy surrounding Jensen's ideas highlights the historical context of scientific racism and the implications of framing educational disparities through a genetic lens. By examining the intersection of race, intelligence, and education, the debate serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in addressing racial inequality within academic and professional spheres.