Pre-Court Forgery and Section 195 CrPC: Major Supreme Court Ruling Decoded

Описание: In this insightful video, we dive deep into a significant ruling by the Supreme Court of India in the case Arockiasamy v. The State of Tamil Nadu & Anr., where the Court clarified the scope of Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the CrPC (now Section 215 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023). The Court ruled that the bar under Section 195 CrPC is not applicable when forgery is committed on a document before it is submitted as evidence in court. We also explore the key takeaways from the landmark judgment Iqbal Singh Marwah v. Meenakshi Marwah, which played a crucial role in shaping this decision. Whether you're a law student, a legal professional, or judiciary aspirant, this case will enhance your understanding of how pre-court forgery is treated under Indian law.

Timestamps:
Introduction to Section 195 CrPC - 00:00:04
Supreme Court's Observations on Pre-Court Forgery - 00:02:05
Applicability of Section 195 (1)(b) Sub-Clause (ii) - 00:02:53
High Court's Role in Forgery-Related Proceedings - 00:04:18
Case Study: Iqbal Singh v. Meenakshi Marwa - 00:08:00
Differentiation Between Pre-Court and In-Court Forgery - 00:13:53
Supreme Court's Key Judgment Points - 00:18:33
Conclusion and Significance of the Judgment - 00:22:42

🔔 SUBSCRIBE NOW for more legal updates & Judiciary exam-focused content!

📢 JOIN US for exclusive study materials, test series & expert guidance:
🔹 Website: 🔗 https://doonlawmentor.com/
🔹 Official App Link 🔗 https://play.google.com/store/apps/de...
🔹 Telegram Group: https://t.me/DoonLawMentorGroup
🔹 Telegram Channel: https://t.me/doonlawmentor
🔹 Instagram: 🔗  / doonlawmentor  

#DoonLawMentor #Section195CrPC #ForgeryLaw #SupremeCourtJudgment #LegalStudies #JudiciaryPrep #LawStudentsIndia #CriminalProcedure #LegalEducation #ArockiasamyCase #IqbalSinghMarwah #Bharatiyanagriksurakshasanhita