The fitna of Mirza Muhammad Ali, the engineer۔

Описание: A Brief Scholarly and Principled Refutation of the Ideas of Mirza Muhammad Ali (Engineer, Jhelum)

Islam is a complete, preserved, and systematic religion that has reached us through revelation, the understanding of the Salaf, and an unbroken scholarly tradition. While everyone has the right to speak, issuing religious judgments is only the right of those who are well-versed in Islamic principles, sources, and ethics.

1. Contradictions in His Statements
In his writings and speeches, Mirza Muhammad Ali frequently adopts one position and later contradicts it. Consistency and adherence to principles are hallmarks of genuine scholarship; repeated contradictions indicate intellectual weakness.

2. Improper Use of Hadith
Authentic deduction from Hadith requires understanding the original Arabic text, its chain of transmission, authenticity, and context. Mirza Muhammad Ali lacks the ability to read Hadith correctly in Arabic and relies solely on translations, which is against the established principles of Hadith sciences.

3. Disrespect Toward Imam Abu Hanifah (رحمه الله)
Imam Abu Hanifah (رحمه الله) was a Tabi‘i, a teacher of thousands of scholars, and a foundational pillar of Islamic jurisprudence. Throughout Islamic history, scholarly disagreement existed, but respect was always maintained. Disagreement is permissible; disrespect and mockery are not.

4. Claim of Being a Great Qari
Despite claiming to be a prominent reciter of the Qur’an, multiple instances of incorrect recitation and violations of the rules of Tajwid have been observed. Such a contradiction between claim and practice is deeply concerning.

5. Unfounded Claim of Scholarship
He is neither a graduate of any recognized Islamic institution nor formally trained under reputable scholars. Yet, he criticizes centuries of great scholars and implies that those before him were misguided—contrary to the Prophetic statement that the Ummah will never unite upon misguidance.

6. Rejection of Scholarly Transmission
The Prophet (صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم) stated that scholars are the inheritors of the prophets. This inheritance has always been transmitted from teacher to student with authentic chains (isnad). Recognized scholars possess this continuity, while Mirza Muhammad Ali has no known teacher, authorization, or scholarly lineage.

7. Harsh and Disrespectful Language
His style of speech is harsh and derogatory, often targeting the pious predecessors and the Companions (رضي الله عنهم). Islamic teachings emphasize good character, patience, and respect; abusive language strips a person’s words of credibility.

Conclusion
The issue with Mirza Muhammad Ali is not mere disagreement but a lack of scholarly grounding, rejection of established tradition, and abandonment of Islamic ethics. Muslims should seek religious knowledge from qualified scholars and remain cautious of self-styled figures who create confusion rather than clarity.
Mirza Muhammad Ali Engineer
Mirza Engineer Jhelum
Fitna Mirza Engineer
Refutation of Mirza Engineer
Islamic scholarly refutation
Misuse of Hadith
Respect of Scholars in Islam
Imam Abu Hanifa رحمه الله
Scholars are inheritors of Prophets
Deviant ideologies in Islam
Ahle Sunnat response
Islamic knowledge with sanad
Bidah and fitna in Islam
True Islamic scholarship
#MirzaMuhammadAliEngineer
#Fitna
#IslamicRefutation
#AhleSunnat
#ProtectIslam
#RespectScholars
#ImamAbuHanifa
#IslamicKnowledge
#TrueIslam
#AgainstFitna