1 MIN AGO Carney Demands Access to Defense Alliance Fund — Washington Blindsided by $95B Power Play

Описание: #NATO #Canada #Carney
In this video, we examine an extraordinary development on February 25th, 2026, when Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney held a closed-door video conference with major European leaders proposing the creation of a $95 billion Alternative Security Partnership Fund within NATO that would operate on qualified majority voting rather than consensus, effectively removing U.S. veto power over alliance security spending decisions.
The proposal represents the most aggressive challenge to American leadership of NATO in the alliance's history and has triggered emergency meetings across the U.S. national security establishment.
This report walks through the proposal step by step, including:

Complete breakdown of Carney's proposed Alternative Security Partnership Fund structure and voting mechanisms
How qualified majority voting would eliminate single-country veto power and allow alliance action without U.S. approval
French President Macron's immediate positive response and commitment of $15 billion to the fund
German Chancellor Scholz's cautious openness to discussing structural reforms
UK Prime Minister Starmer's conflicted position between U.S. alliance and recognition of legitimate concerns
Eastern European member calculations balancing dependence on U.S. protection versus concern about American reliability
Why the Pentagon views this proposal as existential threat to U.S.-led hub-and-spoke global security architecture
Chaotic Washington response including emergency NSC meeting and split between White House confrontation and Pentagon diplomacy
Trump's reported willingness to leave NATO rather than accept reduced U.S. control
Congressional reactions following established pattern of twelve Republicans blaming Trump for alliance fracture
Three scenarios ranging from U.S. concessions that prevent fracture to complete collapse of American-led alliance system

This is a fact-based breakdown of a revolutionary alliance proposal, presented in a clear, analytical format. The focus is on documented meeting details, verified diplomatic positions, structural analysis of NATO decision-making, and implications of removing U.S. veto power from collective security mechanisms.
⚠️ Important Note: This video is presented for educational and analytical purposes to explain NATO governance structures and how alliance decision-making processes can be reformed. It is not intended to promote anti-American sentiment or predict alliance collapse.
If you are interested in NATO governance, alliance reform proposals, collective security decision-making, transatlantic relations, and how defense organizations adapt when traditional leadership structures are challenged, this analysis provides essential context and clarity.
📌 Subscribe for in-depth NATO and alliance analysis
📌 Turn on notifications for breaking diplomatic developments
📌 Share your thoughts respectfully in the comments
DISCLAIMER: This video is an analysis and commentary based on verified diplomatic reporting, NATO structural analysis, official government statements, and defense policy expert assessments. It is intended for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute foreign policy advice. Viewers are encouraged to consult multiple sources and form their own opinions.
🔔 Subscribe for more in-depth international security content
👍 Like if you found this analysis valuable
💬 Share your thoughts in the comments below
#NATO #Canada #Carney #Trump #Alliance #Defense #Europe #France #Germany #UK #Security #PowerPlay #Brussels #Breaking #International