How to Use a Composable CDP Without a Big Data Team

Описание: In this video you’ll learn how even lean teams can run a composable customer data platform using their existing data stack.

Istvan shares what makes a company a good fit for this approach, including typical team structures and why even non-data-heavy industries are starting to adopt warehouse-native solutions.

This is a real talk episode for ops leaders wondering if they can pull off composability without a 10-person data team or a six-figure budget.

#martech #composableCDP #customerdata #marketingops #growthops #LLM

Full episode: https://humansofmartech.com/2025/07/2...

📬 1h episodes turned into 5min takeaways: https://humansofmartech.com/subscribe/

Composable CDPs only work when someone in the organization knows how to make them work. That means understanding how marketing needs differ from product analytics needs, how to model data across both, and how to wrangle a warehouse without wrecking performance. István has seen companies pull it off with a single backend engineer handling the data stack in their spare time. It can function, but every piece of it leans on one person holding it together with context, intuition, and duct tape.

“You need at least one person who knows what they’re doing,” István said. “Most of our customers have one. Some have zero.”

Mitzu’s team steps in with informal guidance when needed. They don’t run full-service data projects, but they will Slack someone a quick fix when BigQuery queries stall out or event models drift off course. That level of support works for teams that know just enough to be dangerous. It also exposes a harsh truth. Composable stacks are fragile when there’s no one with the experience to maintain them. The tools aren’t self-driving. Someone has to steer.

Packaged CDPs and traditional BI tools keep working because they require fewer decisions. For early-stage teams without a dedicated data person, that simplicity matters. You plug them in, send events, and get dashboards. They may feel clunky or bloated later, but they keep the team moving without having to hire for edge-case problems. That tradeoff is often worth it while the business is still figuring out what matters.

A warehouse-native model starts to win when data scale and complexity get too heavy for point-and-click interfaces. Once teams start asking layered questions that cross product usage, marketing channels, and revenue models, the flexibility of working directly in the warehouse pays off. But that flexibility creates overhead:

Someone needs to model data with stakeholders in mind
Someone needs to maintain and debug joins across source systems
Someone needs to translate business needs into warehouse logic
That person is rare. They understand systems, but they also speak marketing. They can tell when a schema decision will break a future dashboard or when an event name will confuse a lifecycle team. The composable CDP isn’t just a tooling decision. It’s a team readiness checkpoint.