Built Ford Tough? Inside the Billion Dollar Super Duty Truck roof collapse Verdicts

Описание: WHAT IS THE PRICE OF A HUMAN LIFE? ⚖️

Two separate Georgia juries reached the same staggering conclusion: Ford sold Super Duty trucks with roofs so weak they were "unreasonably dangerous." Despite combined verdicts of over *$4 Billion*, Ford chose to settle in secret rather than face a final legal ruling.

The Breakdown:
The Hill Case: A $1.7 Billion verdict after a roof collapse killed a couple in an F-250.
The Mills Case: A massive $2.5 Billion punitive award after evidence showed Ford knew about the defect for decades.
The Cost-Benefit Trap: Juries saw evidence reminiscent of the 1970s Pinto scandal—alleging Ford saved less than $10 per truck in steel costs while increasing the risk of death.
The Redesign: In 2017, Ford finally used high-strength steel that met safety benchmarks—but millions of older trucks remain on the road.

In Florida, we hold corporations to a "strict liability" standard. If a product is defective and causes harm, "meeting the minimum" isn't a defense.

What do you think? Are these "nuclear verdicts" the only way to reach the boardroom, or is the system broken? Let’s talk in the comments. 👇

Don't miss a single update—SUBSCRIBE NOW!

📍 Connect with us
Instagram:   / distasioinjurylaw  
TikTok:   / distasioinjurylaw  
Facebook:   / distasiofirm  
Website: https://distasiofirm.com/

Free Consultation: +1 813-259-0022
Send us an e-mail: [email protected]

VIDEO CHAPTERS:
0:00 Introduction: Built Ford Tough?
1:57 The Hill Case: A $1.7 Billion Verdict
5:10 The Mills Case: $2.5 Billion in Punitive Damages
6:55 The Secret Roof Redesign Evidence
7:58 What a Settlement Means (And What It Doesn’t)
8:32 A History of "Cost vs. Lives" (The Pinto Legacy)
9:30 Conclusion: Accountability in the Boardroom