SNS 사용 연령제한에 대해 영어로 말하기 (26년3월 방송)

Описание: .
블로그에서 보기: https://blog.naver.com/knowhereman/22...

문서자료 다운로드: http://www.practicus.co.kr/admin/uplo...

프랙티쿠스 도서 구입하기 https://www.aladin.co.kr/search/wsear...

Summary

Last December, Australia became the first country in the world to completely ban children under the age of 16 from creating or using social media accounts. This was to address growing concerns about online safety for young people, such as cyberbullying, exposure to harmful content, and addiction. Under the new rules, platforms are required to block or delete accounts belonging to minors, and failure to comply can result in fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars.

Following Australia’s strong move, several major European countries—including the United Kingdom, Denmark, France, Spain, and Germany—are now discussing or drafting similar restrictions. While many welcome these measures, critics argue that the ban may be ineffective in practice. They point out that many teenagers can easily bypass the restrictions by creating alternate accounts or circumventing verification systems.

Despite the controversy, there is at least one point on which many people agree: social media can have harmful effects on young people’s well‑being. This is why the role of parents is crucial in helping children use social media in healthy ways and why schools and local communities must also remain actively involved.



Keywords / Key Sentences

​

1. 사이버불링, 유해 콘텐츠 노출, 청소년 간의 과도한 비교 문화가 아이들에게 안 좋은 영향을 미친다.

Cyberbullying, harmful content, and peer comparison culture on social media can negatively affect young people.

Cyberbullying, exposure to harmful content, and an excessive comparison culture all have detrimental effects on teenagers.

Cyberbullying, harmful content, and the pressure to constantly compare oneself with peers can take a serious toll on young people.

​

2. 소셜 미디어 사용을 제한한 후 아동 청소년의 스마트 기기 사용이 줄고 가족과 보내는 시간이 늘어났다는 사례가 많다. 금지 조치는 긍정적 영향을 미친다.

Since the implementation of social media limits for minors, numerous reports have shown a decrease in screen time and increased time spent with family. It’s a sign that such restrictions play a positive role.

In regions that have adopted restrictions, families often observe that children spend less time on devices and more time connecting with one another. These changes point to the potential benefits of limiting social media use.

Evidence from areas with such restrictions show reduced screen time and increased family interaction, suggesting that these limits effectively support youth mental health.

​

3. 정보 접근, 창작 활동, 소속감 증대 등 소셜미디어의 긍정적 효과도 생각해야 한다.

However, the positive effects of social media, such as access to information, creative expression, and a sense of belonging, also need to be considered.

At the same time, the benefits of social media, such as access to information, creative opportunities, and a sense of community, should not be overlooked.

On the other hand, social media offers clear advantages, such as access to information, creative outlets, and stronger social bonds.

​

4. 정책 논의에서 실제로 SNS를 활용하는 청소년들의 생각이나 경험이 반영되지 않았다. 일괄적인 금지는 오히려 청소년의 권리 침해일 수 있다.

In policy discussions, the thoughts and experiences of young people who actually use social media have not been reflected. A blanket ban may infringe on the rights of adolescents.

Moreover, policy debates have often failed to incorporate the perspectives of young people who actively use social media. A one‑size‑fits‑all ban risks violating their rights.

Furthermore, the voices of young people who use social media have been absent from the policy-making process. A comprehensive prohibition could ultimately undermine their rights rather than protect them.