UNILATERAL NO-FAULT DIVORCE: NO FINDINGS OF FACTS NO CONCLUSIONS OF LAW TOTAL DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS

Описание: In this seventh part of an interview with Ryan Pankoe from March of 2019, Ryan and I talked about the fact that in unilateral no-fault divorce, anti-family court judges do NOT base their divorce decrees on facts. FACTS ARE IRRELEVANT TO THE OUTCOME. (And since truth and facts are irrelevant, so is perjury, which is widespread in anti-family court.) There are simply no findings of fact on which they base their conclusions and the divorce decree.

In other words, the judge is NOT acting as a judicial capacity, but he or she is acting in an executive capacity by enforcing a legislatively-decreed divorce and executing the petitioner's will in a ministerial action. Judges will OPEN ADMIT THIS.

Unilateral no-fault divorce is a private (or special) law masquerading under the guise of a public law.

In Article III Section 56 (a)(13), the legislature is PROHIBITED from making special laws for the granting of divorces.

Article III, Sec. 56. PROHIBITED LOCAL AND SPECIAL LAWS. (a) The Legislature shall not, except as otherwise provided in this Constitution, pass any local or special law, authorizing: (13) granting divorces.

My conclusion is that your constitutional-guaranteed protections are VIOLATED AND RENDERED NONEXISTENT in anti-family court--and my conclusion IS BASED ON FINDINGS OF FACTS.

AMERICANS EVERYWHERE SHOULD BE OUTRAGED OVER THIS BLATANT VIOLATION AND DEPRIVATION OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PROTECTION.

Part 7

#RepealUnilateralForcedNoFaultDivorce #UnilateralNoFaultDivorceIsUNCONSTITUTIONAL