Understanding Why Filtering a Stream Changes Its Wildcard Bounds in Java

Описание: This guide explains the nuances of Java's type inference, particularly when using `Stream` in the context of optional types. Learn why adding filtering causes compilation issues while mapping does not.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70433519/ asked by the user 'morgwai' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1220560/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70433906/ provided by the user 'ernest_k' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5761558/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: filtering a stream changes its wildcard bounds?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why Filtering a Stream Changes Its Wildcard Bounds in Java

In Java, especially when dealing with generics and streams, you may encounter situations where the code compiles fine under certain circumstances but not in others. One common scenario arises when you use the Optional type within a Stream.

A reader recently posed an intriguing question about this very issue: why does the first method compile without issues, while the second one does not when a simple filter is added? Let’s dive into the details of this phenomenon and clarify the underlying concepts.

The Problem: Methods and Compilation Errors

Consider two methods for working with a Stream<Number> in Java that appear almost identical at first glance:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While the first method (getNumbers) compiles without a hitch, the second method (getNumbers2) produces the following compilation error:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You might wonder why adding a simple filter causes such a compilation problem when it seems both methods should behave identically. Let’s break this down.

The Explanation: Type Inference and Stream Operations

Generic Methods and Type Inference

In Java, when you use generic methods like map(), the compiler leverages type inference, which allows it to deduce the return type of the method based on the provided context. The signature for the map() method is as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In the case of getNumbers, the compiler understands that the return type of numbers.map(Optional::of) can be deduced as Stream<Optional<? extends Number>> based on its context (the method's return type).

The Role of the filter() Method

On the flip side, the filter() method has a different signature:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Unlike map, filter does not have the flexibility of being a generic method, meaning it is less adaptable to type inference in its current context.

Consequently, when you chain calls after using map(), like in getNumbers2, the compiler can no longer determine that the inferred type needs to be kept as Optional<? extends Number>. Instead, it assumes the most specific possible type, which in this scenario defaults to Stream<Optional<Number>>.

In Summary:

The first method compiles due to type inference from map().

The second method fails because the filtering operation does not allow for the same level of type inference, resulting in incompatibility.

A Side-by-Side Comparison

To further elucidate the differences, consider these additional examples:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The two List.of() methods compile successfully due to the context of their return types.

However, the subList() method fails because it does not infer the list's element type in the same way, defaulting to Object.

Conclusion: Understanding Type Safety in Java Streams

When working with Java Streams, a solid grasp of generics and type inference is essential. The distinction between how map() and filter() operate in terms of type inference is a key reason behind the incompatibility you observed.

To summarize, the inability of filter() to retain the more flexible type bound results in the compilation error faced in the second method. Understanding these nuances can improve your coding practices and help you avoid similar pitfalls in the future.

By mastering these concepts, developers will not only write more efficient Java code but also navigate the complexities of generics with ease. Happy coding!