There Are Two Suno Watermarks — Only One Has Been Tested (2026)

Описание: The 6 August Suno watermarking announcement added a second marker on top of identifiers that already existed — and every published test predates the new one.

CHAPTERS
0:00 The Correction
0:34 Marker One — What Was Already There
1:09 Marker Two — What Was Announced
1:51 The Status Nobody Checks
2:07 Why This Changes What You Read
2:28 The Published Record
4:45 What the Record Doesn't Cover
5:27 The Mechanism
6:16 Why It Happened
6:48 Practicalities
7:54 Scope
8:17 Where That Leaves It

SOURCES
Suno's announcement, 6 August 2026 — reported by TechCrunch, Engadget, Gizmodo, The Next Web and Dataconomy
GEMA ruling, Munich, 31 July 2026

Undetectr — https://undetectr.com/
Pricing (€39 lifetime, was €99) — https://undetectr.com/pricing

The published test record cited on screen:
Skiln — https://skiln.co/blog/is-undetectr-le...
artifactr — https://artifactr.net/undetectr-review/
sunowatermark — https://sunowatermark.com/blog/undete...
PopularAiTools.ai — https://popularaitools.ai/blog/undete...

Product figures come from undetectr.com's own pages, fetched 20 August 2026.
Where a number is the site's own claim, the video says so on screen.

ABOUT THIS VIDEO
Nothing here was tested for this video, so no claim in it is presented as a
measurement. Every figure on screen is attributed to the publication that
reported it, and paired with the Suno version it was measured against.

That pairing is the point. Skiln tested Suno v4, artifactr tested Suno 5.5 in
July 2026, and sunowatermark filed on 26 July 2026 — all of it before the
6 August announcement. So those results describe the marker class that already
existed in Suno files, not the new tamper-resistant watermark announced on
6 August. As of publication no source confirms that newer marker is fully
deployed, and no published test covers it.

Where the video repeats a claim Undetectr makes about its own product, it is
labelled on screen as the site's claim.

More on Rartlett