Open vs Closed SJTs: What Format Works Best in Admissions?

Описание: In this episode, Dr. Kelly Dore and Dr. Muhammad Zafar Iqbal discuss the significance of Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) in higher education admissions. They explore the differences between open- and closed- response formats, the importance of assessing non-technical competencies, and how SJTs can provide a more holistic view of applicants.

The conversation highlights the challenges and benefits of each format, emphasizing the need for institutions to align their assessment methods with their goals.

🔗 RESOURCES
Deloitte Study - https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam...

“Anything you can do, I can do”: Examining the use of ChatGPT in situational judgement tests for professional program admission - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science…

🕐 CONTENT
02:10 - What is a Situational Judgment Test (SJT)?
03:27 - Why are higher ed programs moving towards SJTs?
06:36 - How do SJTs compare to other admissions tools?
12:28 - Common response formats of SJTs
13:38 - Pros and cons of closed-response SJTs
16:56 - Pros and cons of open-response SJTs
21:09 - Key takeaways

🎙️ FEATURED SPEAKERS
Dr. Kelly Dore, PhD:   / kelly-dore-7971b258  
Co-Founder and VP, Science & Innovation at Acuity Insights, Adjunct Professor at McMaster University

Dr. Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, PhD:   / muhammad-zafar-iqbal-8597576a  
Research Scientist at Acuity Insights

Visit our blog for more actionable insights:
https://acuityinsights.com/resources/...