US Army's longest Retreat and PLA Deception tactics. Yalu, 1950.

Описание: How did the PLA manage to move over 300,000 troops into North Korea without detection by U.S. intelligence?
Why did General MacArthur and his intelligence chief fail to anticipate Chinese intervention in Korea?
What strategic warnings did China issue before crossing the Yalu River—and why were they ignored?
What is the difference between the Chinese and U.S. approaches to deception in military operations?
How did the PLA use unit renaming and false identity measures to confuse U.S. intelligence post-invasion?
What were the consequences of the U.S. intelligence failure during the PLA's Second Phase Offensive?
What is the Magruder Principle, and how does it apply to military deception?
How does the PLA use paramilitary and security forces in tactical deception today?
What lessons can modern militaries learn from PLA deception in Korea and its ongoing doctrinal application?

This episode examines the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) use of deception operations during the Korean War, particularly the 1950 intervention across the Yalu River, and contrasts it with the failures of U.S. intelligence. We look at Marshal Peng Dehuai and how he successfully masked the movement of 11 PLA armies into North Korea under the guise of the Chinese People’s Volunteers (CPV). This enabled strategic and operational surprise despite U.S. technical dominance in ISR capabilities.

Chinese combat experience during the war against Japan and the Nationalists developed strong tactical capabilities, including march discipline, concealment, and deception. The PLA leveraged these in Korea through night movements, strict OPSEC, and clever use of terrain. U.S. estimates significantly underestimated PLA troop numbers, a failure attributed to General MacArthur’s intelligence chief, Major General Charles Willoughby, whose reports mirrored MacArthur’s belief that China would not intervene. Did Willoughby provide the Int Reports that MacArthur wanted or was it just a poor assessment?

Initially, the CCP conducted a strategic messaging campaign including multiple diplomatic warnings, public statements, and backchannel communications, all indicating intent to respond to a U.S. advance beyond the 38th parallel. These signals were dismissed as bluff. PLA deception extended post-invasion with the use of coded unit designations and the downplaying of captured Chinese troops, further confusing U.S. threat assessments.
We critique failures in U.S. doctrine, particularly the lack of planning for the most dangerous course of action—Chinese intervention—and the absence of ISR tasking to detect such a scenario. We discuss how MacArthur’s command structure prevented independent intelligence assessments, isolating the CIA and reinforcing or supporting his cognitive biases.
Contemporary PLA doctrine is also discussed, emphasising deception as a foundational component of strategy rather than a supporting function. It outlines the PLA’s use of stratagems, information operations, and feint actions by paramilitary forces.

Doctrine mentioned in this episode:
US Army ATP 7-100.3 Chinese Tactics - https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pu...

#Koreanwar #PLA #YaluRiver #chinesemilitaryhistory #Chosin #militarydeception

00:00 Chinese deception in North Korea
00:48 Marshal Peng’s deception across the Yalu River
01:39 US familiarity with Chinese forces pre-1950
03:23 PLA mobility and MacArthur’s intelligence failure
04:27 Intelligence indicators ignored by MacArthur
05:26 Strategic warnings and Chinese intent
07:16 Formal warnings and diplomatic backchannels
08:10 Soviet parallel messaging and intelligence disbelief
09:02 UN crosses the 38th parallel – strategic misstep
10:03 Chinese preparations for intervention
11:50 Masking Chinese force structure post-invasion
13:38 Walker's offensive and collapse of 8th Army
14:32 From strategic messaging to OPSEC success
15:23 Known PLA doctrine ignored by Willoughby
16:26 MacArthur’s strategic blindness and hubris
17:21 CIA exclusion
18:16 Tokyo command and intelligence stovepiping
19:05 Willoughby’s falsified reports and ethical failure
20:49 Staff quality – lessons from Montgomery and Beattie
21:41 Ralph Seymour and staff loyalty vs. competence
22:35 Willoughby as a yes-man and G2 dysfunction
23:22 Ignoring most dangerous course of action
25:04 Failure of force readiness and austerity impact
26:00 Post-WWII demobilization and training gaps
28:03 Summary of US intelligence and planning failures
28:59 Magruder Principle and Confederate deception
29:58 Quaker guns and deception in the Civil War
31:48 D-Day deception and forms of surprise
32:40 1973 Yom Kippur example – cry wolf effect
34:31 PLA Tactics: maneuver, deception, and infiltration
35:30 Three warfares and comprehensive national power
37:21 Psychological warfare and deception
38:22 PLA security forces and deception roles
40:09 Deception as core to Chinese operations
40:55 Western vs. Chinese use of deception