Col Douglas Macgregor: Trump is Hostage to Donors

Описание: ** NEW MERCH ** Jackets & Sweatshirts, Thermo Mugs!!
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavis...

Col Doug Macgregor argues that President Zelensky should have been firmly shut down by President Trump long ago because, in their view, Zelensky’s primary role is to prolong the Ukraine war rather than seek a settlement. They claim Western funding incentives encourage this prolongation, even though Ukraine—not Russia—is suffering the heaviest casualties and its army has been severely degraded. According to the speaker, Russia is not advancing further west mainly by choice and weather constraints, not Ukrainian strength.

Zelensky is portrayed as operating at the direction of Washington and London, while European leaders are described as weak, unserious, and unwilling to hold him accountable—despite Zelensky publicly criticizing both U.S. and European leadership at Davos for making empty promises. The discussion suggests European elites are the product of decades of post–World War II globalist influence, with figures like Soros allegedly shaping today’s political class.

The conversation then shifts to NATO, arguing that while the U.S. sits at the head of the alliance, President Trump is not exercising real leadership, creating strategic drift. Europe is described as incapable of defending itself without U.S. support due to fragmentation, rivalries, and lack of unified leadership. Historically, Europe has only unified under dominant leaders—and those efforts ended disastrously in Russia.

However, the speaker concedes Europe could become a serious military power if Germany, Austria, France, and Poland unified—but insists this won’t happen under the current “globalist” leadership class. As a result, NATO is predicted to slowly dissolve “with a whimper,” driven by financial strain and political decay, particularly in Germany.

Finally, the speaker suggests Trump recognizes NATO and the Ukraine war are nearing an endpoint but is constrained by powerful donors who want continued U.S. involvement in Ukraine, the Middle East (including Iran), and East Asia to protect their financial interests rather than U.S. national interests.