Finding the Smallest Number Whose Sum of Digits Equals a Given Number n

Описание: Discover the method to calculate the `smallest number` with a specific sum of digits and avoid overflow errors while doing so.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63322525/ asked by the user 'Iroh' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13526303/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63322768/ provided by the user 'selbie' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/104458/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Smallest number whose sum of the digits is equal to the given number n

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Finding the Smallest Number Whose Sum of Digits Equals a Given Number n

When faced with the challenge of determining the smallest number whose digits sum up to a given number n, many of us might wonder how to handle scenarios where n becomes exceedingly large, like 100,000. This question not only revolves around basic mathematical principles but also involves some considerations related to programming, especially when dealing with the limits of data types in languages like C+ + .

The Problem at Hand

For instance, if we take a simpler case where the input is 10, the smallest number with that sum of digits is 19, since 1 + 9 = 10. But what happens when the number becomes more substantial? If you attempt to calculate the smallest number for larger values, you might end up with an Inf as output due to overflow when using data types like unsigned long long int.

So, we need a method that not only gives the correct answer but also avoids overflow issues.

The Solution Approach

Instead of storing the number in an integer and risking overflow, we can directly build the desired number as a string. This approach ensures that we can handle very large sums without running into data type limitations.

Breaking Down the Solution

Here’s how we can construct the solution:

Understanding the Components:

The smallest number can be built using a combination of the first digit and subsequent 9s.

The first digit can be obtained from c % 9, which gives us the remainder when c is divided by 9.

To complete the sum to c, we take additional 9s based on how many full 9s fit into c.

Creating the Code:
Here's a C+ + function designed for this reason:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Example Run

To illustrate how this works, consider the following main function that invokes our getDigits method:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Expected Output

Running the above code prints:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This output is correct as the sum of all the digits of 6 followed by 999...9 indeed equals 987.

Conclusion

In summary, when tasked with finding the smallest number whose sum of digits matches a specified value n, we can make use of a straightforward approach that constructs the number as a string, effectively sidestepping overflow issues. This method not only optimizes performance but also ensures accurate representation of very large results. Implementing this strategy can be a valuable technique in both competitive programming and practical applications where digit summations are necessary.

By understanding the basics of how digits contribute to a sum, you can enhance your mathematical intuition alongside your programming skills.