Reviewing Aman Duggal's response to

Описание: Arvind Animal Activist and Aman Duggal had a debate where there were some major confusions about basic phil and nutrition topics on both sides. So here is my review of their back and forth responses. Hope this helps people learn how to interact with these phil-dependent talking points.

Thanks to Melon Pult from Vegan India Discord for editing this video.

Timestamps:
0:00 : Introduction and Disclaimer
2:44 : Aman yapping about trolley problem
5:14 : Ethics crash course
10:22 : This ain't meta ethics
16:55 : Informal fallacy rant
22:17 : Did arvind concede? (morality="subjective")
23:32 : Normie usage of "subjective"
28:26 : Not an expert montage
30:20 : Did arvind concede?(missing nutrient arg)
32:00 : More rambling about subjectivity
33:44 : "We can arrive at veganism only using logic"
37:07 : Does animal life matter more than human life?
41:57 : Is-ought fallacy explained
58:35 : "Creatine deficiency" claim
1:02:51 : Aman's response to darshan (ntt)
1:08:32 : Miscellaneous

Link to my Insta post about Logical Fallacies:
  / c9do1vos_6n  

My Amazing Prop Logic Course:
   • Philosophy: Prop Logic Course  

My links:
https://linktr.ee/appoota