Arguing Ethical Emotivism with Alex O'Connor

Описание: Alex O'Connor and I have the same view on consciousness (we think it's fundamental) but we radically disagree on whether morality is objective. Here I try to convince Alex that either he joins me in thinking morality is objective, or he gives up his view that consciousness is fundamental. He can't have it both ways!! AM I RIGHT??

If you have any questions about the discussion, subscribe to my Substack and I'll try to answer them in this month's 'Ask Me Anything' video: https://substack.com/@philipgoff

Pre-order my book "Why? The Purpose of the Universe" in paperback: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Why-Purpose-...

Join me in conversation with William Lane Craig, Jessica Frazier, and Joseph Folley at the Royal Institution, May 1st: https://www.thepanpsycast.com/reserve...

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE AND SUPPORT MY PUBLIC WORK WITH $4 A MONTH IF YOU'RE ABLE
I have a very demanding job and young kids, and so use this money to pay someone to edit the videos. I couldn't do this without your support, so thank you!   / philipgoffphilosophy  

00:00-33:44 Qualia without Value Objectivity
33:45-1:26:37 Goff and O'Connor Debate
1:26:38-2:16:35 Psychological Hedonism
2:16:36-2:26:18 Sean Carroll on the Knowledge Argument