Solve the Issue of Empty Values in Dictionary Configuration Sections for ASP.NET Core

Описание: Discover how to address the problem of empty values in dictionary configuration sections when using Options in ASP.NET Core. Explore provided solutions and enhance your configuration practices.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/76783672/ asked by the user 'syca1447' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/22297398/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/76783886/ provided by the user 'Quickz' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5946094/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Options Values are always empty/null for a Dictionary configuration section

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Issue: Empty Values in Dictionary Configuration

If you’re working with ASP.NET Core and your configuration options are returning empty or null values, you're not alone. This common pitfall often arises when binding complex objects from appsettings.json to options models using dependency injection. In this article, we will explore a specific scenario involving dictionary configurations, how to identify the underlying problem, and ways to effectively resolve it.

The Configuration Example

Consider the following configuration in your appsettings.json:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You've set up your options models like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In your Startup class, you configure services as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, when you attempt to access these options, you find that the values are always empty or null in your controller:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Root of the Problem

The primary issue is that the code implicitly expects a Tenants object to be nested within another Tenants object. Since this nesting is not present in the JSON structure you provided, the binding fails. Thus, your options model cannot retrieve the intended values, resulting in an empty dictionary.

Solutions to the Problem

Here are two effective methods to resolve this issue and correctly bind your configuration options.

Option 1: Remove the GetSection Method Call

In this method, you can simplify your configuration binding by removing the GetSection call. This way, the entire configuration under "Tenants" is bound directly to the TenantsOptions model:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Option 2: Modify Your JSON Structure

Alternatively, if you prefer to retain the GetSection, you can adjust your appsettings.json structure. To meet the binding expectation of your options model, nest the Tenants as shown below:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

In summary, if you're struggling with empty values in dictionary configurations while using ASP.NET Core options, start by examining the structure of your JSON against your model expectations. By either simplifying your configuration binding or correctly structuring your JSON, you can resolve this issue effectively. By ensuring a match between your configuration structure and your options models, you enhance the robustness of your application and ensure reliable access to application settings.

Now that you are armed with these solutions, you can confidently handle similar issues in your projects and improve your understanding of ASP.NET Core configurations.