Understanding Why DBRA Outperforms Traditional Looping in Motorola 68k Assembly

Описание: Discover the reasons behind the impressive speed of the `DBRA` assembly instruction in Motorola 68k compared to traditional subtraction loops. Learn how instruction handling affects performance!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62568944/ asked by the user 'Jason' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12702027/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62575103/ provided by the user 'Thomas Jager' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5567382/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why is dbra so fast for a very large loop count in Motorola 68k?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Why is DBRA So Fast for Large Loop Counts in Motorola 68k Assembly?

Motorola 68k assembly is a rich and intricate language that offers a unique opportunity to explore low-level programming concepts. As programmers dive into its capabilities, they often encounter perplexing behavior regarding loop constructs and execution times. One such mystery arises when comparing different looping methods, particularly the DBRA instruction against traditional loop counters.

The Problem: Discrepancies in Loop Performance

In one experiment, a programmer creates two loops intended to waste time. The first loop utilizes the DBRA instruction, while the second employs a standard subtraction and branch approach. Surprisingly, the DBRA loop finishes almost instantly, while the subtraction-based loop seems to hang indefinitely even though both should theoretically run a similar number of iterations.

Here’s a breakdown of the two looping methods:

Using DBRA

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using Subtraction and Branching

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Solution: Understanding the Performance Difference

1. Instruction Complexity

The performance difference primarily derives from how the DBRA and the subtraction instruction (SUB) operate. As specified in the Programmer's Reference Manual, the DBRA instruction only manipulates and evaluates the lower 16 bits of the loop counter.

Key Points:

DBRA directly decrements the lower half of a register and continues if it does not reach -1.

Traditional subtraction with SUB operates on the full register size, leading to significantly more operations.

2. Execution Counts

The DBRA loop runs approximately 0x10000 times due to the decrementing behavior being limited to 16 bits. In contrast, the subtraction loop executes around 0xFFFFFFF times, leading to vastly increased processing requirements, and ultimately dragging performance down.

3. Impact of Register Width

Another significant aspect is how the register values are affected upon loop completion:

The DBRA instruction leaves the loop counter at 0x0FFFFFFF, while the subtraction-based loop exits with 0.

4. Detailed Results on Loop Completion

DBRA Outcome: Retains the original count in D0.

Subtraction-Based Outcome: Reduces D0 to 0, showcasing that extreme differences in design logic affect throughput.

Additional Considerations

While we focus primarily on speed differences, it's worth noting there seems to be a lack of consensus in manuals regarding the exact behavior of DBRA in specific edge cases. For instance, when the loop counter hits zero and the condition is true, variations exist on how the decrement should be stored. Here are the two perspectives:

Programmer's Reference Manual (PRM): States that the condition being true takes priority; thus, the count is not stored back.

Microprocessor User’s Manual (UM): Suggests the subtraction result prevails, potentially leaving a -1 if the loop condition is satisfied.

Both references provide valuable insights, but it’s always best to refer to the PRM as the authoritative source for behavior specifications.

Conclusion

In summary, the stark difference in timing between the DBRA loop and traditional subtractive loops in Motorola 68k assembly boils down to how these instructions interact with the underlying architecture. Leveraging DBRA not only optimizes performance but also showcases the elegance of assembly programming when it comes to efficient control flow.

By understanding these nuances, programmers can more effectively harness the capabilities of the Motorola 68k architecture and optimize their assembly programs for remarkable performance.