Leading Strategy Paper Series: Porter Kramer 2006 "Strategy & society"

Описание: Dr David Webb describes the paper by Porter, M.E. & Kramer, M.R. (2006). "Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility", Harvard business review, 84(12),78-92

This video forms part of the first Leading Strategy paper series.
Please like the video and subscribe to our channel to help support us!

If you would like to understand more about Corporate Shared Value and the link to the Stakeholder View of the responsibilities of the firm then David has produced a series of short lecture chunk videos that you can find by through the following links:

12.1. Strategy and CSR - Corporate Shard Value (CSV) -    • 12.1. Strategy and Responsibility  - CSR -...  
12.2. Strategy and CSR - Social Value and The Market -    • 12.2. Strategy and Responsibility - CSR - ...  

This forms part of a much longer series of strategy papers, which includes the two main series below.

Papers in series 1.
• Christensen, C.M. (2001), "The Past and Future of Competitive Advantage", MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 105-109.
• Porter, M.E. (1996). "What is strategy?", Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78
• Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, G. (1990). "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91
• Kim, W.C., and Mauborgne, R. (2005) “Blue Ocean Strategy: from Theory to Practice”, California Management Review, 47(3) 105-120.
• Porter and Kramer (2006). “Strategy and Society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility”, Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92
Papers in series 2, a broader view of strategy, include:
• Campbell, A., Good, M. and Alexander, M. (1995) "Corporate Strategy: The Quest for Parenting Advantage", Harvard Business Review, 73, 2, 120-132
• * Montgomery, C. A. (2008) “Putting leadership back into strategy”, Harvard Business Review, 86(1), p54-60
• * Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1992) “The Balanced Scorecard--Measures That Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-89
• * Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. and McDonald, R. (2015) Disruptive Innovation?, Harvard Business Review, 93, 12, 45-53
• * Smith, J.H. (2003) “The Shareholders vs. Stakeholders Debate”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), p85-90