Should NATO End? Greenland, Burden-Sharing, and the Case for a Stronger Europe (Episode 77)

Описание: Some observers warn that pushing Greenland too far could fracture the alliance—and claim Russia and China would celebrate.

In Logic Dictate Hot Topics Episode 77, host Steve Gibson argues the opposite: NATO has long functioned as a U.S. security umbrella that created European dependency, and that arrangement is outdated. Europe has the GDP, population, and military capability to defend itself—and a stronger, more autonomous Europe is not a gift to Putin or Xi. It’s a strategic upgrade for the West.

Steve also challenges the legitimacy of Denmark’s sovereignty claim over Greenland, framing it as colonial attachment—and argues the most meaningful voice belongs to the people who live in Greenland. If the U.S. seeks greater influence or a territorial agreement, Steve argues it should be done peacefully, strategically, and through negotiation—especially given Greenland’s importance to Arctic security.

Topics covered:

Greenland and NATO tensions: will it break the alliance?
Europe’s defense capability: why the U.S. shouldn’t be Europe’s protector forever
Denmark sovereignty claim vs. Greenland self-determination
Arctic security strategy and why Greenland matters
Why “Russia and China celebrating” is a flawed narrative
Why the U.S. pursuing a Greenland deal isn’t inherently radical (as argued in the episode)

Links mentioned:
https://www.logicsdictate.com

https://amzn.to/4oAo6AJ

👍 Like / Subscribe / Comment:
Should Europe take primary responsibility for its defense—even if NATO changes dramatically?

#NATO #Greenland #Europe #Arctic #Geopolitics #SteveGibson #LogicDictate