SAVE America Act-How to Force the Dems' Hand plus Bringing the Receipts on Somali Fraud & Major V...

Описание: 1. SAVE America Act (Election Law & Voter ID)


Core Argument


• The SAVE America Act would:

• Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote

• Require photo ID to vote


• Democrats are portrayed as unanimously opposed, preventing passage due to the Senate’s 60‑vote threshold.


Strategic Claim


• Cruz argues Republicans should:

• Force a “real” filibuster (continuous floor speeches)

• Make Democratic opposition politically and physically costly


• He frames Democratic resistance as intentional rather than procedural.


Public Opinion Framing


• Polling is cited (CNN, Pew) to claim:

• Broad bipartisan and multiracial support for voter ID


• Democratic leadership (especially Chuck Schumer) is accused of ignoring their own voters.


2. Voter Fraud & Ballot Harvesting


Claims Presented


• Ballot harvesting is described as:

• A system that enables fraud, especially among elderly or vulnerable populations


• Democrats are accused of:

• Supporting policies that increase fraud opportunities

• Reversing recommendations from the Carter–Baker Commission



• There is justification for:

• Photo ID laws

• Restrictions on mail-in voting

• Limits on third-party ballot collection



3. Somali Welfare Fraud in Minnesota


Central Allegation


• Massive welfare fraud in Minnesota tied to programs serving the Somali immigrant community.

• Figures cited include:

• Up to half of $18 billion in welfare spending allegedly lost to fraud

• Disproportionately high welfare participation rates among Somali households



• Democratic state officials are accused of:

• Knowing about the fraud

• Allowing it to continue for political gain

• Silencing whistleblowers



•

• Stolen welfare funds indirectly finance al‑Shabab, a terrorist organization



4. Medical Policy Shift on Gender Surgeries for Minors


Key Development


• The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Medical Association are described as:

• Reversing prior support for “gender‑affirming surgeries” for minors

• Now recommending deferral until adulthood



Causal Explanation


• The reversal is attributed to:

• A high‑profile malpractice lawsuit by a detransitioner

• Legal and financial risk to medical institution



Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson (https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-t...) and The Ben Ferguson Show (https://nam04.safelinks.protection.ou...) Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening


YouTube:    / @verdictwithtedcruz   (https://nam04.safelinks.protection.ou...)


Facebook:   / verdictwithtedcruz   (https://nam04.safelinks.protection.ou...)


X: https://x.com/tedcruz (https://nam04.safelinks.protection.ou....