Migrating Your Flask App to a Docker-Swarm Cluster

Описание: Learn how to migrate your Docker Compose setup to a single-node Docker Swarm cluster while keeping HAProxy for SSL termination.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75249957/ asked by the user 'csuser' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17394234/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75254632/ provided by the user 'Chris Becke' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/27491/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Migrate docker-compose to a single node docker-swarm cluster

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Migrating Your Flask App to a Docker-Swarm Cluster

Are you gearing up to migrate your Flask application from a Docker Compose setup to a single-node Docker Swarm cluster? If so, you’re on the right track for boosting the security and scalability of your application. In this guide, we will delve into the migration process, addressing how to incorporate HAProxy and organize your Docker services effectively.

Understanding Your Current Setup

Currently, you have a Flask application connected to a MySQL database, running on a single web server. For security, you're utilizing HAProxy to redirect traffic to the localhost interface, exposing only the public interface on port 443. This allows you to protect your application from public access while managing your database connections effectively.

Here’s a quick recap of your existing configurations:

Docker Compose Configuration

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

HAProxy Configuration

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Questions Addressed

As you contemplate your migration, you raised several important questions:

Should HAProxy remain as a systemd service, or containerize it within Docker Swarm?

If containerized, how can we maintain a separation of network interfaces while keeping HAProxy public-facing and the app and database on localhost?

Migrating to Docker Swarm: A Detailed Explanation

Setting Up Docker Swarm

The first step is to initialize Docker Swarm on your server:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This command sets up your server as a Swarm manager.

Configuring Docker Compose for Swarm

To migrate your current Docker Compose setup to Docker Swarm, you will modify your service definitions. One of the key advantages of Docker Swarm is that it provides private networking out-of-the-box, simplifying service communication.

Your modified docker-compose.yml may look like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Understanding Network Configuration

Internal Network: Services like your database and application can communicate over this private overlay network. They can resolve the database using the connection string mysql://db:3306 without exposing the database port publicly.

External Network: This is the interface that HAProxy will use to interact with the public. By binding HAProxy to this network, you maintain security while still allowing traffic redirection.

Containerizing HAProxy

Advantages of containerizing HAProxy include:

Easier Configuration Management: Changes can be applied directly to the HAProxy container, simplifying deployments.

Dynamic Traffic Routing: Using labels, you can route traffic based on conditions without restarting the HAProxy service.

You can keep HAProxy as a standalone service if you're already comfortable with managing it outside of Docker. However, if you prefer to fully embrace Docker Swarm, containerizing HAProxy would enhance your deployment agility.

Conclusion

Migrating to a single-node Docker Swarm cluster not only amplifies your security posture but also makes your application scalable and easier to manage in the long run. Whether you choose to containerize HAProxy or keep it on the host system, understanding the underlying network architecture is crucial for success.

Now, it’s time to implement these changes and prepare your application for its production debut. Enjoy the benefits of increased security and flexibility with Docker Swarm — you’ve earned it!