Brian Albert's HOUSE SUSPECTS BUTT DIAL EACH OTHER and Alan Jackson asks if Chloe made those calls?

Описание: Brian Albert DENIES CHLOE MADE THE BUTT DIALS. Phone Records show how many BRIAN HIGGINS and BRIAN ALBERT's BUTT DIALS between themselves there were and they were busy!. | Karen Read Trial for John O'Keefe.

Forensic linguistic analysis of Boston Police Sergeant Detective Brian Albert reveals 23 deception indicators including deception, documentary evidence of coordination, and real-time witness coaching exposed.

🔴 THE MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY

Three beings in room when Brian Higgins called at 2:22:52 AM: Brian Albert, wife Nicole, and Chloe the dog. Jackson establishes Nicole didn't answer and Chloe didn't answer. Albert denies he answered - creating logical impossibility. If two of three didn't answer, the third HAD to answer. Albert admitted June 2022: "Yeah it's only possible that it's me." May 2024: "I don't recall saying that." Progressive retreat from admission. I was not Chloe that answered the BUTT DIAL afterall.

🔴 THE SMOKING GUN: CALL RECORDS

Brian Albert has six siblings, five kids, huge family. Morning John O'Keefe found dead on his lawn, Albert's FIRST call 7:20 AM went to Brian Higgins - not family. Same person he had suspicious 2:22 AM contact with and destroyed phones with.

January 29, 2022 Calls:
• 7:20 AM - Albert → Higgins (1:56) FIRST CALL
• 7:30 AM - Higgins → Albert (5:47)
• 7:57 AM - Albert → Higgins (12:33)
• 3:24 PM - Albert → Higgins (6:05)
• 6:12 PM - Albert → Higgins (1:07)
• 6:35 PM - Albert → Higgins (10:12)

SIX calls to Higgins on January 29 alone. Also calls to brother Kevin Albert, Jen McCabe (found body), Chief Berkowitz (police brass). Documentary proof of coordination.

Jackson asks: "Were those calls effort to get stories straight?" and "Were those calls discussing creating story of mysterious butt dials?" Call records don't lie.

🔴 WITNESS COACHING EXPOSED

Morning: Zero mention of cell reception issues.
Lunch: Albert meets prosecutor Lally.
Afternoon: Suddenly introduces "dead zone" excuse.

Jackson catches it: "When did you and Mr Lally talk about cell phone reception? What refreshed your memory between this morning and now?"

Albert: "I was just thinking about it" and "you caught me off guard."

Temporal sequence proves lunch coaching. Claims conversation only about "time left" but admits discussing redirect topics.

🔴 SEPTEMBER 22 CONSCIOUSNESS

September 22, 2022: Albert destroys iPhone - same day as first nationally televised Karen Read hearing.

Asked what he knew about September 22 hearing: "I didn't know anything about it. Knew nothing about it no."

30-year Boston detective claims ignorance of televised hearing involving fellow officer on day he destroyed evidence. Professional impossibility.

🔴 ADDITIONAL MARKERS

"Of Course" Slip: "I don't know subject of calls" then "of course it was a horrible situation." Real-time contradiction.

"I Wish They Had": "He would have been welcomed with open arms and I wish they had I really do." Reverse psychology - stating wish for what you're glad DIDN'T happen.

"Were You Even Aware" Question: Prosecutor sets lowest bar - not if he SAW them, just if "aware" they were "in area." Question reveals consciousness.

📊 METHODOLOGY

Advanced forensic statement analysis: process of elimination logic, documentary evidence through phone records, temporal sequence analysis, memory evolution across hearings, real-time contradiction detection, professional impossibility claims.

Based on actual trial transcript Commonwealth v. Karen Read, testimony Boston Police Sergeant Detective Brian Albert, May 13, 2024. Albert is 30-year Boston Police veteran who testified about events surrounding death of fellow officer John O'Keefe outside Albert's home 34 Fairview Road, Canton, Massachusetts, January 29, 2022.

Perfect for true crime enthusiasts: Karen Read case analysis, statement analysis, deception detection, body language, courtroom testimony, witness coordination, police testimony, Massachusetts murder trials, forensic linguistics.

All findings verified against court records. No speculation. Pure mathematical, documentary, and linguistic forensics.

VEROSCOPE™ Forensic Linguistic Analysis | Commonwealth v. Karen Read

#KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BrianAlbert #TrueCrime #StatementAnalysis #JohnOKeefe #BrianHiggins #DeceptionDetection #CantonMassachusetts #CourtTestimony