2021 NSF CAREER: Advice from CAREER Reviewers

Описание: This session was a part of a half-day workshop hosted by FSU's Office of Research Development. This virtual event provided faculty with information critical to the National Science Foundation CAREER submission as well as the opportunity to hear from past reviewers and awardees.

S H O W N O T E S

0:54 - Introduction of Reviewers (In Order of Appearance)
Theodore Baker: [email protected]
Biwu Ma: [email protected]
Sachin Shanbhag: [email protected]
3:21 - What are some of the common denominators of successful proposals seen?
10:15 - What are some of the biggest errors/missteps that would lead to a rejection?
27:22 - What is the chance of an NSF Proposal being accepted without having preliminary data or results?
30:48 - How should an applicant demonstrate potential for future works based on what they have already done? How should an applicant distinguish what I have done and my future work?
36:31 - Should an applicant describe how they can evaluate the success of all the proposal activities, research, and educational outreach in their project?
44:10 - Should the analysis be quantitative for some activities since it’s difficult to quantitatively evaluate the success for some activities?
45:37 - If you could give one piece of advice that is essential, what would that be?
The Office of Research Development is able to review proposals and offer feedback if enough time is given. ORD also has Research Mentoring sessions for those interested.
Mentoring Resources: https://www.research.fsu.edu/research...

 Panelists: Drs. Ted Baker, Biwu Ma, and Sachin Shanbhag
Hosted by Beth Hodges, Director of the Office of Research Development
Edited by Evangeline Ciupek, Office of Research Development
Music: "Interplanetary Forest" by Meydn*

For more research development services and resources, please visit ord.fsu.edu.

Attribution licensing. License: Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)