9 Cat Treats To AVOID (And The 2 That Are Worth It)

Описание: 9 Cat Treats To AVOID (And The 2 That Are Worth It)

In 2023, Blue Buffalo paid thirty-two million dollars to settle a federal lawsuit after admitting their cat food contained the exact by-products they publicly condemned other brands for using. But grab the wrong treat off the shelf and what you're really feeding your cat is rendered animal waste, artificial dyes restricted across Europe, and antifreeze chemicals disguised as a loving reward. For anyone managing a cat's kidney diet or anyone who switched to a premium brand to protect their pet, these aren't just bad ingredients. They're shortening your cat's life while promising to improve it. Today we're exposing nine cat treats that failed our investigation, including two that charge premium prices for the same risks as budget brands. Stay until the end, because we'll reveal the only two treats that actually tested clean.

📘 Get our FREE Ultimate Food Creator Guide: https://consumed-yt.com/products/the-...

🐱 The 2 cat treats we recommend:
✅ Vital Essentials Freeze-Dried Cat Treats – Single ingredient, pure raw protein, no fillers: https://www.amazon.com/Vital-Essentia...

✅ PureBites Freeze-Dried Chicken Breast Cat Treats – Just 1 ingredient, human grade chicken: https://www.amazon.com/Purebites-Chic...

📺 Watch the entire video for more details!

About Consumed
🎥 Videos about all kinds of food issues, from fake ingredients to shocking fast food secrets
🎨 Written, voiced and produced by Consumed
🔔 Subscribe now for more all kinds of food issues, from hidden additives to fast food breakdowns

Watch More from Consumed
🟢    / @consumedfood  

💼 Business Inquiries and Contact
• For business inquiries, copyright matters or other inquiries please contact us at: [email protected]

❓ Copyright Questions
• If you have any copyright questions or issues you can contact us at: [email protected]

⚠️ Copyright Disclaimers
• We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines
• Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”
• This video could contain certain copyrighted video clips, pictures, or photographs that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.