Courtroom ERUPTS as Judge Roasts Defendant for Doing ‘Absolutely Nothing’!

Описание: Hashtags:

#CourtCase #StateVsOrtiz #LegalProceedings #CourtroomDrama #JudgeRemarks #SentencingHearing #DrugCharges #NoContestPlea #CriminalJustice #CourtTranscript #LawAndOrder #CrimeAndJustice #JusticeSystem #LegalEducation #CourtUpdates #PleaAgreement #FelonyCase #JudicialProcess #CourtroomClip #LegalSummary





Subscribe My Channel[ ‪@TheJudgmentRoom-k5f‬ ]





Summary:

The case of State vs. Juan Ortiz involves two felony charges related to controlled substances. During the hearing, the court confirms that Ortiz and his attorney have received and reviewed all discovery materials. Ortiz knowingly waives the reading of both indictments and signs all required documents, including admonishments and waivers.

In the first case (cause ending in 68), the State proceeds on Count 1: Possession with Intent to Deliver Penalty Group 1, 4–200 grams, a first-degree felony with a punishment range of 5–99 years or life, plus a fine of up to $10,000.
In the second case (cause ending in 67), the State proceeds on Count 2: Possession of a Controlled Substance Penalty Group 1B, 400 grams or more, carrying a punishment range of 10–99 years or life, with a possible fine up to $100,000.

Ortiz acknowledges understanding the charges, the plea instructions, and the fact that entering a plea waives several constitutional rights, including jury trial and confrontation of witnesses. His attorney confirms that Ortiz is competent, understands the charges, and has provided no legal defenses.

Ortiz enters no contest pleas in both cases. The State offers plea agreements recommending 14 years in prison for each charge, to run concurrently, along with $5,000 fines. The court accepts the pleas, finds sufficient evidence of guilt, and officially sentences him to 14 years imprisonment, concurrent across all relevant cause numbers, with credit for time served. Additional conditions include no residing with minors and loss of firearm rights due to felony convictions.

At the end, the judge questions Ortiz about his children and grandchildren, emphasizing the dangers of drug distribution, especially when minors are exposed. The judge urges Ortiz to reflect on his choices and the impact on future generations.

Disclaimer:

This video is for educational and informational purposes only.
It does not provide legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for professional legal consultation.
All statements, commentary, and summaries are based solely on publicly available court footage and do not represent any judgment, opinion, or accusation against any individual.
Viewer discretion is advised.