Notorious B.I.G. Mom's Estate sues FAITH EVANS Over Biggie's CATALOGUE Deal! (FULL Legal Breakdown)

Описание: The Notorious B.I.G.’s Mother's estate is taking Faith Evans to court in a shocking lawsuit involving millions of dollars, music rights, and legacy control. In this video, I break down the official lawsuit filed by Wayne Barrow, the trustee of Biggie’s late mother Voletta Wallace’s estate, against Biggie’s widow and R&B star Faith Evans.

I pull up and analyze the actual lawsuit documents, explaining the legal terms and allegations in layman’s terms so you fully understand:

✅ How Faith Evans allegedly took control of Biggie’s music company
✅ Why the estate is fighting for access to a Multi-MILLION deal with Primary Wave
✅ The legal battle over profits, power, and Biggie’s legacy
✅ What it means for the future of artist estates, music rights, and entertainment law

This is more than just celebrity drama — it’s about control over one of hip-hop’s most iconic catalogs.

🔔 Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more in-depth legal breakdowns on high-profile lawsuits involving entertainers, artists, and athletes.

📜 Legal insight. Real documents. No fluff.

#FaithEvans #NotoriousBIG #BiggieSmalls #BiggieEstate #BiggieLawsuit #FaithEvansSued #HipHopLawsuits #MusicRights #PrimaryWave #EntertainmentLaw #CelebrityLawsuits #CopyrightLaw #MusicIndustryNews #MusicCatalog #artistrights
________________________________________

TO SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:

*CashApp | https://cash.app/$AttorneyGeoff
*PayPal | https://paypal.me/AttorneyGeoff
*Venmo | https://venmo.com/attorneygeoff

Legal Disclaimer: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine. All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).