He Asked One Legal Question. She Filibustered on Live TV — Until He Called Her Out.

Описание: In one of the most revealing congressional exchanges of the year, Rep. Joe Morelle asked Attorney General Pam Bondi a direct legal question:
Can a presidential pardon cover crimes committed later, unrelated to the original offense?

Instead of answering, Bondi dodged, deflected, invoked Hunter Biden, and avoided giving a straight legal response — even when Morelle quoted the Department of Justice’s own definition of what a pardon actually is.

This wasn’t a debate about who can issue a pardon.
It was about something much deeper:
👉 Can a president create permanent immunity for their allies — even for crimes committed after the pardon?

That’s not how the Constitution works.
That’s not how pardons work.
And that’s not how democracy works.

This moment was bigger than courtroom theory.
It raised a chilling question:
Are we allowing a path to legal untouchability — to presidentially protected lawlessness?

Rep. Morelle didn’t just ask a question.
He exposed a legal and constitutional red line — and a refusal to acknowledge it.

📌 What do YOU think?
Should a pardon ever apply to crimes committed after the fact?
Is Congress losing control over executive power?

👇 Share your thoughts in the comments.
🔔 Subscribe for more deep-dive breakdowns on legal battles, political accountability, and real-time hearings.