Good vs Evil Explained | Reaction to Sufiyan on Javed Akhtar - Mufti Debate | More in Description

Описание: References:

Sufiyan’s video:    • Does God Exists? Lallantop Debate & The Co...  

Lallantop debate: https://www.youtube.com/live/sejkUeZS...

Context & Disclaimer:

In this video, I respond to a segment from Sufiyan’s video where the discussion focuses on good and evil, drawn from the Javed Akhtar vs Mufti ‘Does God Exist’ debate. I respectfully disagree with certain points raised and attempt to address some of the questions discussed by Sufiyan and Ankit. The views shared here are solely my personal thoughts and reflections. I am not representing any individual, group, or ideology, nor am I influenced by anyone. This video is intended purely for open discussion and thoughtful exchange.

Q. Is afterlife compensation a tool for the rich?
From a believer’s perspective, afterlife compensation doesn’t benefit the rich—both rich and poor are equally accountable, and no one escapes judgment. Wealth doesn’t grant immunity.

From a non-believer’s perspective, justice comes through laws, institutions, and moral responsibility in this life. Wrongdoing must be actively stopped.

In neither view is injustice justified. And as believers, staying silent against injustice is itself a failure of the test.

Q. If God created evil and gave us choice, why test us for choosing wrong?
From a belief-based perspective, creation itself is a test, and free will is central to it. God allows the existence of both good and evil and grants humans the freedom to choose between them. The existence of evil does not remove accountability—choosing it remains a moral failure. If humans were created to do only good, the idea of testing and responsibility would have no meaning.

Q. If life is a test, why correct others—unlike an exam where you write your own?
The exam analogy is illustrative, not literal. In an exam, individuals operate in isolation and are not allowed to correct others. Real life, however, is lived collectively—we interact, influence one another, and share moral responsibility. From a believer’s perspective, encountering wrongdoing and choosing how to respond is itself part of the test. Therefore, correcting wrongdoing or stopping injustice is not wrong; it is a moral good and an essential aspect of accountability.

Q. Does good now mean bad afterlife, and bad now mean good after?
The question assumes a direct inverse relationship between life and afterlife—good now leading to bad later, or bad now leading to good later—which is not logically accurate. If life is understood as a test, all actions—good or bad—are accountable. Compensation or consequences in the afterlife are determined by one’s choices and deeds, not automatically linked in an opposite pattern. There is no teaching that suggests a guaranteed reversal of outcomes; the focus is on moral responsibility and judgment based on actions.

Conclusion:

As believers, we are expected to exercise our free will to choose good, reject evil, and actively oppose injustice—remaining silent is not an option. In Islam, witnessing wrongdoing—whether directed at ourselves or others—comes with the responsibility to act, rather than passively waiting for divine compensation in the afterlife. Accountability in this life and the hereafter is linked to our actions, and moral courage in confronting injustice is considered part of the test of faith.

I welcome corrections and am eager to learn; I apologize if I have caused any offense, as that was never my intention.

#javedakhtar #muftishamailnadwi #sufiyana #sufitramp #ankit #doesgodexist #goodvsevil #reaction