Declaration of Michael Foster in Foster vs Gildred Bowman K. Blaine

Описание: RELIEF SOUGHT

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Michael Foster respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:

Accept and Enter into the Record Plaintiff’s Live Recorded and Notarized Declaration as a valid and lawful substitute for personal appearance at the hearing scheduled on October 31st, 2025, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 98.

Formally Acknowledge Plaintiff’s intent and good-faith efforts to participate in proceedings and recognize that prior absence or delay in filings were influenced by the psychological framing and judicial characterizations presently challenged.

Reconsider or Review prior rulings and judicial findings—including the dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint—to the extent that such rulings may have relied on subjective or prejudicial characterizations, including those framed in psychiatric or psychological terms such as “incoherent,” “disjointed,” or “a rambler,” particularly where such framing may have been influenced by Defendant’s assertions or extra-judicial materials.

Take Judicial Notice of Plaintiff’s concerns regarding the validity and voluntariness of the 2020 Court-Ordered Settlement Agreement, including allegations of duress, misrepresentation, and coercive context at the time of execution.

Acknowledge and Investigate Plaintiff’s claims of abusive psychological profiling and reputational manipulation by Defendant Tom Gildred, and determine whether such conduct—through misuse of mental health-related framing—has unduly influenced the legal narrative and proceedings in this matter.

Preserve Plaintiff’s Right to Seek Additional Remedies, including but not limited to:

Motion for judicial disqualification or reassignment due to potential conflict of interest under CCP §§ 170.1 and 170.3;

Motion to vacate or set aside the 2020 settlement agreement if found procedurally or ethically defective;

Motion to amend or refile claims should new evidence, context, or procedural fairness justify such action.
Defendant Gildred's narrative of Gildred vs Foster's 2020 Court-

ordered Settlement Agreement says Michael Foster admits to impersonating Mr. Gildred. Michael Foster hadn't wedded a Carolina Hernandez, or a Carolina Garcia of her first marriage. Formally an immigrant
from Puebla Mexico and a mother of two DACA teenagers.
The Forcefully Induced Court-ordered Settlement Agreement confirms Carolina Gildred was merely a dance student persuaded by Michael Foster to sponsor his flights and pay him cash deposits in 2016. Michael Foster was not traumatized about Carolina Hernandez calling off wedding ceremonies over discrepancies naming Tom's live-in personal assistant (Current marketing director) as her primary reason. Michael Foster hadn't flustered over sudden flights to New York City and Stressed over paying $500.00 overnight suites in order to save dates to a Gildred Wedding Ceremony. Michael Foster did
not marry a Carolina and his favorite Dinner is NOT Shredded Chicken Breast. M.F. IS NOT an IMPERSONATOR.

PREFACE... Continued:
According to a Mrs. Carolina Gildred's quote in 2016: "Michael, Tom Can't Figure You Our. However today before judge the honorable Bowman, in Foster vs Gildred, Tom Gildred has figured Michael Foster out. To the extent that Michael Foster have figured Mr. Tom Gildred and have filtered out the reasons why the Gildred defense narrative continues to dwindle. For example: The early use of Gildred's Scorch Earth Tactics shocked me into emotionally charged documented records of those inas well ordered myself to post nice things exclusive to Lords and to glorify the Gildreds. " Attorney Rafkin continued. The Law now represents a Settlement Agreement in any manner can dimmer a rainbows color when fashioned by the Gildred v Foster's History. The Background & Origin of Foster vs Gildred began where Tom Gildred and his wife sued alleging blackmail, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, impersonation, criminal conduct, mental illness, extortion and related claims. That lawsuit made no mention of trips or cash deposits paid around a (BEA-2016) Business Equity Agreement involving the USPTO trademark MCSI Intelligent Security and business URLs unrelated to Gildred vs Foster claims.

Plaintiff respectfully submits this declaration and associated materials under penalty of perjury,
The CPA approach to Trash-Collecting boasted as part of Mr. Tom Gildred's own biography. Not taken for granted a Point Loma youth in community service
Trash collecting frames a man's calculated thoughts to format concept to best understand Trash inappropriately laid by that specific community. By conduct a Point Loma community at that time, if Trash were indeed found to be improperly disposed the lute would have been dark but lucrative. Searching for Trash in the New York Supreme Court Gildred v Foster Forcefully Induced Settlement Agreement and now by the Defendants Aug 11th Cluster filings in this Court substantiates a dark lute of corruption