Lovable vs V0 vs Figma Make vs Codex vs Claude Code: Which One Wins?

Описание: I tested 5 leading front-end prototyping tools (Lovable, v0, Figma Make, Codex with GPT-5.3, and Claude Code with Opus 4.6) by building the same running coach web app from a PRD. v0 won for design (9/10) and speed (4 minutes), while Codex excelled at UX depth but struggled with design quality. This comparison reveals why specialized front-end tools still outperform general-purpose AI coding assistants for rapid prototyping.

🎬 Subscribe to the channel for more content on AI and vibe coding:    / @vibecodingacademyai  

🔗 Resources Mentioned:
• Excalidraw Comparison Chart: https://link.excalidraw.com/l/7UEX1ZY...
• Master Course (Build Production-Ready Apps): https://www.vibecodingacademy.ai/cour...

⏱️ Timestamps:
0:00 - Introduction: GPT 5.3 and Opus 4.6 just dropped
0:16 - Why front-end prototyping matters
1:36 - Testing all 5 tools with a running coach app PRD
6:13 - v0 evaluation: Design, UX, interactivity
8:24 - Figma Make evaluation
9:59 - Codex (GPT 5.3) takes over 10 minutes
11:17 - Lovable evaluation
12:04 - Codex results: Great UX depth, poor design (4/10)
14:00 - Claude Code (Opus 4.6) takes 18+ minutes
16:06 - Final verdict and key learnings
17:18 - My recommended workflow

💡 Key Takeaway: Start with specialized front-end tools (v0, Lovable, Figma Make) for your prototype, then sync to Cursor to build backend and business logic. This is the workflow I teach in my Master Course.

🚌 Go to Vibe Coding Academy (https://vibecodingacademy.ai/) if you want to become an "AI-powered" Product Builder capable of shipping ready for production features and applications without the help of developers

🔗 Connect with me
LinkedIn:   / jules-boiteux  
Twitter: https://x.com/julesboiteux
Website: https://vibecodingacademy.ai/