ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

Torres v. Madrid Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Автор: Quimbee

Загружено: 2023-05-30

Просмотров: 2154

Описание: Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Torres v. Madrid | 141 S. Ct. 989 (2021)

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects American citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. The United States Supreme Court considered whether police officers seized a fleeing woman when they shot her, even though she got away, in the twenty twenty-one case Torres versus Madrid.

During the summer of twenty fourteen, four police officers went to an apartment building in Albuquerque, New Mexico, intending to execute a warrant for a woman accused of multiple crimes. In the parking lot, the officers spotted Roxanne Torres standing by her car. The officers knew that Torres wasn’t the woman they were looking for, but they wanted to speak with her. While they were on their way over, Torres got into her car. She was currently in the throes of methamphetamine withdrawal and was completely oblivious to the officers until one of them tugged on her car door. Convinced that the officers were carjackers, Torres stepped on the gas. Officers Janice Madrid and Richard Williamson fired thirteen shots at Torres, hitting her two times. Torres managed to get away, but not for very long. She was arrested at an Albuquerque hospital the next day.

After pleading no contest to aggravated fleeing from a law enforcement officer, among other charges, Torres filed a Section Nineteen Eighty-Three lawsuit against Officers Madrid and Williamson in federal district court. Basically, this type of lawsuit allows people to sue police officers and other state agents for civil-rights violations. Specifically, Torres claimed that the officers used excessive force by shooting her, violating her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures of her person. The district court entered summary judgment for the officers, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed, finding no seizure because Torres got away. Torres appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which granted cert.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/torres-...

The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/torres-...

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_...

Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Facebook ►   / quimbeedotcom  

Twitter ►   / quimbeedotcom  

#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Torres v. Madrid Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

Brinegar v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Brinegar v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

4 Hours Chopin for Studying, Concentration & Relaxation

4 Hours Chopin for Studying, Concentration & Relaxation

ЧП в Крыму.  Москва без интернета. Трамп снимет санкции для Путина? Цена нефти. Навальный | ВОЗДУХ

ЧП в Крыму. Москва без интернета. Трамп снимет санкции для Путина? Цена нефти. Навальный | ВОЗДУХ

Tennessee v. Garner Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Tennessee v. Garner Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Case of the Month: Riley v. California

Case of the Month: Riley v. California

How a case gets to the US Supreme Court

How a case gets to the US Supreme Court

Программа «Статус» с Екатериной Шульман и Максимом Курниковым | 10.03.2026

Программа «Статус» с Екатериной Шульман и Максимом Курниковым | 10.03.2026

СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИЧЕСКАЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ ПОЛИЦЕЙСКИХ: ТОРРЕС ПРОТИВ МАДРИДА

СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИЧЕСКАЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ ПОЛИЦЕЙСКИХ: ТОРРЕС ПРОТИВ МАДРИДА

Уголовно-правовое прецедентное право в Нью-Мексико: анализ новых судебных дел

Уголовно-правовое прецедентное право в Нью-Мексико: анализ новых судебных дел

Переговоры FLETC – Скотт против Харриса

Переговоры FLETC – Скотт против Харриса

Vega v. Tekoh - Case Law for Cops

Vega v. Tekoh - Case Law for Cops

Harry Styles - American Girls (Official Video)

Harry Styles - American Girls (Official Video)

Can the Police Use Evidence They Got Illegally? | Mapp v. Ohio

Can the Police Use Evidence They Got Illegally? | Mapp v. Ohio

Maryland v. Pringle

Maryland v. Pringle

Why Stop-and-Frisk is Legal | Terry v. Ohio

Why Stop-and-Frisk is Legal | Terry v. Ohio

Мошенник из Кремля. Как Мединский стал близок к Путину и заработал на этом

Мошенник из Кремля. Как Мединский стал близок к Путину и заработал на этом

Удар по Брянску: есть погибшие. В Москве отключают интернет. Зачем Трамп звонил Путину

Удар по Брянску: есть погибшие. В Москве отключают интернет. Зачем Трамп звонил Путину

FLETC Talks – Tennessee v. Garner

FLETC Talks – Tennessee v. Garner

Navarette v. California Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Navarette v. California Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Florida v. Royer Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Florida v. Royer Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]