Blake Lively LOSES ANOTHER LAWSUIT: Justin Baldoni EXONERATED By EVIDENCE in COPYRIGHT CASE

Описание: #blakelively #justinbaldoni #itendswithus

Blake Lively was SURE that Justin Baldoni MUST HAVE settled a copyright case because he was guilty. She floated this narrative so much. The surviving spouse sued Bryan Freedman, alleging that he traded up by taking on Baldoni as a client after representing him. Turns out that is all a lie. Blake is losing, and it's getting embarrassing.

Support the Channel By Becoming a Member:
   / @withoutacrystalball  

Follow Katie Joy on Social Media:

Instagram:   / withoutacrystalball  

Facebook:
  / withoutacrystalball  

Disclaimer:

Without a Crystal Ball is a commentary channel. The views expressed by Katie Joy are her opinions and should not be considered fact. Katie Joy discusses trending topics, current events, reality tv & More. This channel is for your entertainment. Please make sure you conduct your own research on any topics to verify any information.


All Clips Obtained through TLC YouTube & Used under Fair Use:


The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.”
THIS VIDEO AND OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL IN GENERAL MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH WE BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.