PT 365 Polity, Governance & Social Issues - 6
Автор: UPSC with Saurabh Kaushik
Загружено: 2026-02-24
Просмотров: 33
Описание:
For the PDF, join our Telegram group for easy access and regular updates.
Telegram: https://t.me/CurrentAffairswithKaushik
In this video, we are going to cover the key topics from Vision PT 365 –Polity, Governance & Social Issues for UPSC CSE Prelims 2026.
3.2 PERSONALITY RIGHTS (Page 1)
Why in News?
Delhi High Court protected Personality Rights of Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev from AI misuse.
About Personality Rights
Right to control unauthorized use of:
Name
Image
Voice
Likeness
Distinctive expressions/traits
Includes commercial & non-commercial aspects
Not expressly codified in any statute in India
Components
Right to Publicity
Indirectly governed by Trademarks Act, 1999 & Copyright Act, 1957
Right to Privacy
Protected under Article 21
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (2017) judgment
Posthumous Personality Rights
No specific statutory recognition
Emblems Act, 1950 restricts commercial use of images of Mahatma Gandhi & Prime Minister
Deepa Jayakumar v. AL Vijay (2019) – Rights end after death
Important Judgments
ICC Development v. Arvee Enterprises (2003)
Arun Jaitley v. Network Solutions (2011)
Rajinikanth v. Varsha Productions (2015)
3.3 PHONE TAPPING (Page 1–2)
Why in News?
Madras HC held secret phone tapping violates right to privacy.
Legal Framework
Post Office Act, 2023
Allows interception of communication through post
Telecommunications Rules, 2024
Issued under Telecommunications Act, 2023
Procedure & safeguards for lawful interception
Indian Telegraph Act, 1885
Section 5(2): Grounds – Sovereignty, security, public order, etc.
10 agencies authorised at Centre:
IB
CBI
ED
NCB
CBDT
DRI
NIA
R&AW
Directorate of Signal Intelligence
Delhi Police Commissioner
Requires order by:
Secretary, Union Home Ministry
State Home Secretary
Validity: 2 months (renewable)
Exception for Press (accredited communication)
IT Act, 2000
Governs interception of electronic communication
Landmark Case
PUCL v. Union of India (1997)
Upheld validity of Section 5(2)
Laid down procedural safeguards
Order only by Home Secretary
3.4 CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF NARCO TESTS (Page 2)
Why in News?
Supreme Court overturned Patna HC order allowing narco-tests on accused & witnesses.
About Narco-Analysis
Drug used: Sodium Pentothal
Suppresses reasoning & self-control
Key Judgments
Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010)
Involuntary narco violates:
Article 20(3) – Right against self-incrimination
Article 21 – Personal liberty
Involuntary results inadmissible
Voluntary Narco
Cannot be direct evidence
Facts discovered may be admissible (Indian Evidence Act, 1872)
Reiterated in:
Vinobhai v. State of Kerala
Manoj Kumar Soni v. State of M.P.
No absolute right to demand narco-test
#polity
#personalityrights
#righttoprivacy
#article21
#PuttaswamyJudgment
#phonetapping
#IndianTelegraphAct
#Section5_2
#PUCLCase
#itact2000
#NarcoTest
#Article20_3
#SelviCase
#fundamentalrights
#judicialreview
#upscprelims2026
#pt365polity
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке:
