The Presumption of Innocence - Past vs Present

Описание: How has the presumption of innocence changed from past to present? Has it even changed that much? And what principles remain the same?
How the Presumption of Innocence Has Changed Over Time
Historical Context:

In medieval times, guilt or innocence was determined through trial by ordeal, involving torture or dangerous tests (e.g., ducking stools, boiling water).
These methods relied on supernatural beliefs rather than evidence or fairness.
Accusations alone often led to presumed guilt, public humiliation, and irreversible harm—even if the accused was later found innocent.

Modern Parallels:

Today, while legal systems uphold the presumption of innocence, trial by media can undermine this principle.
Media coverage can lead to public judgment before a fair trial, damaging reputations and livelihoods.
Sensationalist reporting and social media outrage can mimic the mob mentality of the past.

Core Principles That Remain:

The rule of law in Australia ensures:

Everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Fair and just administration of laws.
The right to a fair trial.


These principles are also protected by human rights frameworks.

Key Message:

The presumption of innocence must be upheld both inside and outside the courtroom, including in media reporting.
Failing to do so risks repeating historical injustices.