Real Lawyer Reacts to Daredevil (The Trial of Frank Castle) // LegalEagle

Описание: ⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! https://legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
Is Frank Castle a hero or a villain? Is Matt Murdock a good lawyer or a bad one?
Get a two free originals and a 30-day trial of Audible (and support this channel) by texting "legaleagle" to 500-500 or clicking here: https://www.audible.com/legaleagle

Special thanks to Daredevil expert, Nando v Movies, for the assist! Check out the channel here:    / @nandovmovies  
I especially love his pitch for Ant Man 2:    • Nando Pitches Ant-Man 3  

My video on the Paul Manafort situation:    • Real Law Review: Manafort Plea Explodes, A...  

A legal analysis of Frank Castle's trial from season 2 episode 7 and 8 of Marvel’s Daredevil. As Vulture eloquently put it: “In the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the “trial of the century” does not concern O.J. Simpson, but Frank Castle. It’s finally time for the Punisher to stand trial, and thanks to just about every imaginable thing going wrong, Nelson and Murdock must defend him against District Attorney Reyes, who has a stacked deck and enough clout to steamroll our favorite tiny firm with ease.”

The trial starts with jury voir dire. For inexplicable reasons the judge is mad at counsel for their inability to find an unbiased jury. Things go off the rails from there. At lot of good procedure, but right off the bat, the judge should have declared a mistrial. Still, fun to talk about reserving opening statements, federal rules of evidence, and expert cross examinations.

(Thanks to Audible for sponsoring this video and helping to make this channel possible)

New episodes weekly! Subscribe here:
https://www.youtube.com/legaleagle?su...

★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts: https://goo.gl/hw9vcE
Laws Broken: https://goo.gl/PJw3vK
Law 101: https://goo.gl/rrzFw3
Real Law Review: https://goo.gl/NHUoqc

I get asked a lot about whether being a practicing attorney is like being a lawyer on TV. I love watching legal movies and courtroom dramas. It's one of the reasons I decided to become a lawyer. But sometimes they make me want to pull my hair out because they are ridiculous.

Today I'm taking a break from representing clients and teaching law students how to kick ass in law school to take on lawyers in the movies and on TV. While all legal movies and shows take dramatic license to make things more interesting (nobody wants to see hundreds of hours of brief writing), many of them have a grain of truth.

This is part of a continuing series of "Lawyer Reaction" videos. Got a legal movie or TV show you'd like me to critique? Let me know in the comments!

All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!

========================================================

★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ ➜   / legaleagledj  
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜   / legaleaglereacts  
★ Stella’s Insta ➜   / stellathelegalbeagle  

For promotional inquiries please reach out here: [email protected]