Who Wrote the Gospels: Polycarp & Irenaeus PROVE Traditional Authorship

Описание: JOIN OUR DISCORD SERVER:   / discord  

Clarifications
–Perumalil (1980, p. 336) seems to imply that Irenaeus’ Presbyter in Book 4 is distinct from Polycarp. I would differ on this and find Hill’s case to be more convincing.

Credits
Scriptwriting: External
Visuals: External
Voiceover: External

Thanks to Mzer of CanonChronicles for providing feedback on this video!

References
Arnold, B. T. (2009). Genesis. Cambridge University Press.

Bauckham, R. (2006). Jesus and the Eyewitnesses The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony (1st ed.). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
—(2009). From the Lost Teaching of Polycarp: Identifying Irenaeus’ Apostolic Presbyter and the Author of Ad Diognetum. By CHARLES E. HILL. The Journal of Theological Studies, 60(2), 674–676. doi:10.1093/jts/flp055

Behr, J. (2013). Irenaeus of Lyons: Identifying Christianity. Oxford University Press.

Gathercole, S. (2018). The Alleged Anonymity of the Canonical Gospels. JTS, 69(2), 447-476.

Goswell, G. (2017). Authorship and Anonymity in the New Testament Writings. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 60(4), 733-749.

Hill, C. E. (1998). What Papias Said About John (and Luke) A “New” Papian Fragment. JTS, 49(2), 582-629.
—(2000). Cerinthus, Gnostic or Chiliast A New Solution to an Old Problem. Journal of early Christian studies, 8(2), 135-172.
—(2004). The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church. Oxford University Press
—(2006). From the Lost Teaching of Polycarp: Identifying Irenaeus' Apostolic Presbyter and the Author of Ad Diognetum. Mohr Siebeck.
—Hill, C. E. (2010). Who Chose the Gospels Probing the Great Gospel Conspiracy. Oxford University Press
—(2012). The Man Who Needed No Introduction: A Response to Sebastian Moll. In Irenaeus: Life, Scripture, Legacy (pp. 95-104). Fortress Press.
—(2017). The Authentication of John: Self-Disclosure, Testimony, and Verification in John 21: 24. In The Language and Literature of the New Testament (pp. 398-437). Brill.

Keener, C. S. (2009). The Gospel of Matthew A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
—(2010). The Gospel of John (Vol. 1). Van Haren Publishing

Loke, A. T. E. (2017). The origins of divine Christology. Cambridge University Press.

Metzger, B. M (1997). The Canon of the New Testament, Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Clarendon Press

Petrie, C. S. (1967). The Authorship of ‘The Gospel According to Matthew’: A Reconsideration of the External Evidence. New Testament Studies, 14, pp 15-32 doi:10.1017/S0028688500018488

Perumalil, A. C. (1980). Are not Papias and Irenaeus competent to report on the Gospels The Expository Times, 91(11), 332–337.

Roberts, A., Donaldson, J. & Coxe, A. C. (Eds.). (1885). Ante-Nicene Fathers (Vol. 1). Christian Literature Publishing Co.

Schaff, P. & Wace, H. (Eds.). (1890). Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series (Vol. 1). Christian Literature Publishing Co.