COVID lockdown, unbalanced Impact on Women and implications |

Описание: During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the submission rate to scholarly journals increased abnormally (e.g., more than 90% in Elsevier’s health & medicine journals). Given that most academics have been forced to work from home, the competing demands for home-schooling, child and other care duties might have penalised the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we looked at submitted manuscripts and peer review activities for all Elsevier journals between February and May 2018-2020, including data on almost 6 million academics. Results showed that women submitted proportionally fewer manuscripts than men during the COVID-19 lockdown months. This deficit was especially pronounced among women in more advanced stages of their career. The rate of peer-review invitation acceptance showed a less pronounced gender pattern, with the exception of health & medicine, where women were also less keen to accept reviewing. Our findings indicate that the pandemic has already created cumulative advantages for men.

Speaker: Bahar Mehmani (Elsevier)

=================

This recording is from a presentation at Pure International Conference 2020 #PRCN2020. To know more, visit the Pure International Conference 2020 event page:
💻 https://www.elsevier.com/events/confe...

=================

If you found this video helpful, give it a thumbs up 👍, share your insights in the comments below 💬 and pass it on to a colleague.

To watch more videos about how other research leaders use Pure, SciVal, Scopus and other solutions in the Research Intelligence suite, hit subscribe 🔔.

=================

For updates, connect with us:
LinkedIn:   / elsevier-research-intelligence  
Twitter:   / elsevierpure  

#ResearchManagement #CRIS #RIMS #Pure #Elsevier #RDM