Understanding the add Operand Type Mismatch Error in GNU Assembler

Описание: Discover why you're encountering the `operand type mismatch for add` error in GNU Assembler and learn how to resolve it with effective solutions.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/73018924/ asked by the user 'Citra Dewi' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19502111/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/73021814/ provided by the user 'Sep Roland' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3144770/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Error: operand type mismatch for `add' immediate value GNU Assembler intel syntax

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the add Operand Type Mismatch Error in GNU Assembler

When working with assembly language, encountering errors can be quite common, especially when dealing with operations that involve different operand types. One such error that many assembly programmers face is the operand type mismatch for the add instruction. This guide will explore the nature of this error and provide a detailed explanation of how to resolve it effectively.

The Problem: Operand Type Mismatch Error

You may have experienced this error while trying to execute the following assembly code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This operation produced the frustrating error message:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In another attempt, you might have used:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Even though you were sure r9 was 64-bit wide, you still encountered confusion and difficulty understanding why the error persisted. Interestingly, when substituting the immediate with 0xffffffffffffffff, the operation worked fine because this represents a specific case in the assembler's encoding mechanisms.

Understanding Immediate Values in Assembly

Immediate Values Defined

An immediate value is a constant value embedded directly within the instruction itself. In assembly language, these values can range in size and type. However, the add instruction in the GNU Assembler has certain restrictions when it comes to using immediate values, particularly when they are of 64-bit size.

The add Instruction Limitation

The GNU Assembler (GAS) does not support a direct 64-bit immediate within the add instruction for most regular cases. The specific code instruction you originally attempted to compile encounters problems because it exceeds the encoding capabilities for the add opcode.

Most instructions in x86-64 assembly can only handle a limited set of immediate values. As a result, attempting to use a 64-bit immediate like 0x4014000000000000 directly led to the operand type mismatch for the add instruction.

Effective Solutions for 64-bit Immediate Addition

Move Immediate to a Register First

To work around this limitation, the recommended approach is to first move the immediate value to a scratch register and then add that register's value to your target register. Here’s how to do it correctly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This two-step process effectively resolves the operand type mismatch by allowing the add instruction to handle values present in registers rather than trying to directly add an unsupported immediate.

Understanding Why Certain Immediates Work

Your instruction add r9, 0xffffffffffffffff works because this specific value translates to -1, a number that fits neatly within the assembler’s encoding constraints. The assembler can easily handle it as a sign-extendable value, which permits encoding it using fewer bytes.

Immediate Values Encoding:

For specific ranges, such as the values between 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFF80 to 0x000000000000007F (which corresponds to -128 to + 127), the assembler can utilize a sign-extendable 8-bit immediate.

For values between 0xFFFFFFFF80000000 to 0x000000007FFFFFFF (which corresponds to -2147483648 to + 2147483647), a 32-bit immediate can be used.

Conclusion

In summary, whenever you’re working with assembly language and encounter the operand type mismatch error while using the add instruction, remember to utilize scratch registers for immediate values. This method effectively bypasses the assembler's limitations and allows you to execute your desired operations seamlessly. Understanding the encoding intricacies and knowing how to leverage registers will undoubtedly enha