835. EMAIL #25: NeuroToken™ Authorization Framework: RE: Thought Recording Technology and Telepathy

Описание: EMAIL #25 (of 27)
(sent to every single US Governor and every single US Senator as well as the top EEG devices manufacturers globally)

NeuroToken™ Authorization Framework: RE: Thought Recording Technology and Telepathy

Good day,

There are many benefits to Thought Recording Technology in advancement of knowledge and understanding, potential future treatment advances and even economic benefits from organizations and jurisdictions participating in this type of research as well as continued development and application of this type of technology given that this is such a new and potentially burgeoning field.

This technology will be transformative to numerous fields of study, especially those 'grey matter' fields of study (psychology, cognitive science, etc.) and as such should not be prohibitively restrained. These prohibitive restraints of course a most likely default stance for those security conscious organizations given the risks that this technology represents.

Thus, we need to have the appropriate controls in place to allow for the many beneficial and legitimate uses of Thought Recording Technology while guarding against the illegitimate uses.

The following presents one of many potential solutions to this problem.

NeuroToken™ Authorization Framework

Defintions:

NeuroToken™: a single or multi-use secure authorization token that gives access to and use of any Neuro-Enabled Platform.

Neuro-Enabled Platform: any technology, device or platform that supports the playback, recording or storage of the electrical signals the human brain produces, typically referred to as NeuroData.

NeuroData: data collected from the electrical signals that the human brain produces.

Neuro-Pathic Data: is NeuroData that includes any Telepathic communications.
(alternatively, the definition of NeuroData can be expanded to include Neuro-Pathic Data)

Framework:

Thus the NeuroToken™ Authorization Framework would be a centrally managed and controlled (or federated) system that allows for the legitimate uses of this technology complete with automated collection, interpretation and reporting of the uses of NeuroData while guarding against illegitimate uses. Any interested country or organization would be able to utilize this framework to ensure that this technology is not being used to access information (especially on key individuals) in an inappropriate manner.

Any Neuro-Enabled Platform will need to be integrated into this platform in a secure and sealed manner to ensure that these controls cannot be circumvented and therefore allowing for misuse.

There will be strong motivation on behalf of all countries to consistently apply and enforce such a framework, complete with the adoption of new comprehensive legislation, due to the risk that this technology represents to a country's sovereignty and personal sovereignty of its population.

This of course represents a significant challenge since the creation and adoption of a framework such as this takes time, especially at the international level. This is something that needs to change shortly before this technology and what I have presented starts being used in a mainstream manner.

This framework must be universally agreed to and consistently applied and enforced by all countries for it to be effective, especially considering that Telepathy does not obey geopolitical boundaries.

In lieu of global acceptance of this type of framework we will see the advent of Neuro-Neutral jurisdictions which can be taken advantage of in numerous ways. This is akin to what we see with Tax Havens where individuals and organizations can circumvent policies and legislations that they otherwise deem overly restrictive.

This framework does not address the existing PiezoElectric-based microphone technology problem which will need to be addressed separately. It also does not address existing Neuro-Enabled platforms which will need to be properly tracked and deprecated at end-of-life cycles to ensure that this technology is not inappropriately repurposed. Fortunately, most countries already have existing tracking processes and systems in place for restricted technologies and we should be able to piggyback on these systems for this purpose.

Clearly there is a lot more to this than what can be conveyed in a forum such as this and I would be more than happy to discuss in detail.

I can be contacted via the details below.

Sincerely

Steven Whatmore
[email protected]
416.577.0057

PS: The current version of the PDF containing the entire set of emails related to Thought Recording Technology in PDF form: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MF_1...

My name is Whatty - Can you hear me!